首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Agronomy >Effectiveness of the GAEC standard of cross compliance Prohibition of performing unauthorized land levelling on soil erosion control
【24h】

Effectiveness of the GAEC standard of cross compliance Prohibition of performing unauthorized land levelling on soil erosion control

机译:GAEC交叉合规标准的有效性禁止对土壤侵蚀控制进行未经许可的土地平整

获取原文
           

摘要

The GAEC standard land levelling under authorization of cross compliance prohibits farmers from levelling land through bulldozing without a specific permission issued by the proper territorial authority. The aim of the standard is to ensure the protection of soil from accelerated erosion that almost always occurs when land is levelled without conservative criteria. Land levelling prior to planting or replanting specialized crops, especially orchards, is indicated by agronomists as essential to the full mechanization of cultivation and harvesting operations and the success of economic investment. Land levelling leads to a deep modification of the hill slopes, so it may produce serious damage to the environment if carried out in the absence of a carefully planned design. In other words, a design that takes the aspects of soil conservation into account, especially for steep hill slopes where the insite and offsite environmental impacts of soil erosion may be more pronounced. With regard to the areas involved, land levelling plays a key role on a national scale, one only needs to think of the vineyards planted on the country’s hill slopes, which in 1970 covered an area of 793,000 hectares. Moreover, despite the continued reduction in areas planted with vines, from 1990 to 2002 the area devoted to DOC and DOCG wines increased by about 29% and the average size of vineyards has also increased. This is a clear sign of the current trend, with the transition from the family model to the industrial model of orchard management, with extensive use of machinery and thus the use of bulldozers for levelling. The authorization topic, on which the standard of compliance is based, is analysed in detail. In summary we can say that, according to law, the permit required by the GAEC standard is currently mandatory only for those areas subject to the Hydrogeological constraint (Royal decree 30 December 1923 No. 3267) and for parks or other areas for which the regional regulations are more rigorous. Land levelling in other agricultural areas is excluded from the requirement to obtain prior authorization. Owners are only required to submit a DIA (statement of commencement of activity) to the Public Authority. However, permission is granted by law, in the event of lack of ruling by the Authority (implicit consent principle). This GAEC standard assumes that permission (where due) granted by the local authorities responsible for territorial governance is sufficient to avoid the damage that could be caused by land levelling. In other words, the standard does not dictate the agronomic rules to be followed in carrying out land levelling, but refers to already existing local rules and assumes that the authorization is granted on the basis of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). At the present time, only a few local governments take land levelling into consideration in their territorial governance legislation. In general, there is no rule requiring that the application for authorization be accompanied by a project containing the items considered necessary, in the present study, to enable the authorities to express well-pondered judgment. In addition, local territorial rules do not require the execution of land levelling and subsequent approval of the finished work to be carried out under the supervision of a geologist or a pedologist . At present, the GAEC standard is very weak, due to the lack of coordination between the provisions of cross compliance and territorial governance legislation focused on land levelling. It is common practice for the landowner, after obtaining permission, to assign the work to an earthmoving company with no expertise in soil protection and which possibly also has an interest in moving large volumes of earth. This may contribute to an increase in severe environmental damage. Land levelling, undertaken by virtue of a simple DIA and lacking environmental expertise, is very risky and can cause severe damage to soil resources and the landscape. This is particularly true in areas prone to hydrogeological risk or where the soil is thin or fragile in relation to some of its qualities or environmental functions. The results of some researchers on Italian case studies have shown the extent to which land levelling undertaken disregarding the rules of environmental protection can cause serious disturbance to the soil resource, resulting in impressive truncation or burial of the original soil profile, with severe reduction in land capability , even to the extent of desertification. Results showed that there was a drop in production, especially in excavation areas. Furthermore, changes in the quality of products and a general decay in the vegetative state of plants and water stress were observed. In one case study, land levelling performed before planting a vineyard determined excavation and accumulation thicknesses respectively up to 19 and 16 metres. In another case study soil erosion after land levelling re
机译:根据交叉合规授权的GAEC标准土地平整禁止农民未经适当领土当局的明确许可而通过推土进行土地平整。该标准的目的是确保保护土壤免受加速侵蚀,而在没有保守标准的情况下将土地平整几乎总是发生这种情况。农学家认为,在种植或补种专门作物(特别是果园)之前进行土地平整对于耕种和收获作业的全面机械化以及经济投资的成功至关重要。土地平整会导致山坡的深度改变,因此如果在没有精心计划的设计的情况下进行,可能会对环境造成严重破坏。换句话说,一种设计考虑了土壤保持的方面,特别是对于陡峭的山坡,在这种陡峭的山坡上,土壤侵蚀的现场和非现场环境影响可能更为明显。对于涉及的地区,土地平整在全国范围内发挥着关键作用,人们只需要考虑在该国山坡上种植的葡萄园,该葡萄园在1970年占地793,000公顷。此外,尽管葡萄种植面积持续减少,但从1990年到2002年,用于DOC和DOCG葡萄酒的面积增加了约29%,葡萄园的平均面积也增加了。这是当前趋势的明确标志,随着果园管理从家庭模式向工业模式的转变,广泛使用机械,因此使用推土机进行水准测量。详细分析了符合性标准所基于的授权主题。总而言之,我们可以说,根据法律,GAEC标准目前要求的许可仅对受水文地质约束的地区(1923年12月30日的皇家法令第3267号)以及公园或其他区域法规更加严格。其他农业地区的土地平整不在获得事先授权的要求之列。业主仅需向公共机构提交DIA(活动开始说明)。但是,如果管理局缺乏裁决(隐式同意原则),则根据法律授予许可。该GAEC标准假定负责地区治理的地方当局授予的许可(应有的话)足以避免土地平整可能造成的损害。换句话说,该标准并没有规定进行土地平整时应遵循的农艺规则,而是指已经存在的当地规则,并假定该授权是根据详细的环境影响评估(EIA)授予的。目前,只有少数地方政府在其领土治理立法中考虑了土地平整。一般而言,在本研究中,没有规则要求授权申请必须附有一个包含必要项目的项目,以使当局能够表达出充分的判断力。另外,当地的领土规则不要求执行土地平整和完成工作的后续批准,而要在地质学家或儿科医生的监督下进行。目前,GAEC标准非常薄弱,这是因为交叉合规规定与针对土地平整的领土治理法规之间缺乏协调。土地所有者在获得许可后,通常的做法是将工作分配给土方公司,而土方公司没有土壤保护方面的专门知识,并且也可能对大量土方有兴趣。这可能会导致严重的环境破坏。依靠简单的DIA进行土地平整并缺乏环境专业知识,这是非常危险的,并且可能严重破坏土壤资源和景观。在容易遭受水文地质风险的地区,或者相对于某些质量或环境功能而言,土壤稀薄或脆弱的地区尤其如此。一些研究人员对意大利案例研究的结果表明,不考虑环境保护规则而进行的土地平整在多大程度上会对土壤资源造成严重干扰,导致原始土壤剖面被截断或掩埋,严重减少了土地面积。能力,甚至达到荒漠化的程度。结果表明,产量有所下降,特别是在开挖地区。此外,观察到产品质量的变化以及植物的营养状态和水分胁迫普遍恶化。在一个案例研究中,在种植葡萄园之前进行了土地平整,确定了分别高达19米和16米的开挖厚度和堆积厚度。在另一个案例中,土地平整后的土壤侵蚀

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号