首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of public health. >Share of Nations in 37 International Public Health Journals: An Equity and Diversity Perspective towards Health Research Capacity Building
【24h】

Share of Nations in 37 International Public Health Journals: An Equity and Diversity Perspective towards Health Research Capacity Building

机译:37种国际公共卫生期刊中的国家份额:卫生研究能力建设的公平与多样性视角

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:This paper contributes to further exploration of inequity in access to health research capacity development by examining the representation of different nations in international public health journals. It also aims to examine the degree of diversity that exists in these journals.Methods:This study is a descriptive survey. It was done with objective sampling on 37 ISI health journals on October of 2008. The number and nationality of people in different editorial positions of the journals was identified. The second analysis involved recalculating the numbers obtained for each nation to the population size of nations per million inhabitants. In order to better compare countries in terms of presence in editorial team of the journals, a ‘public health editor equity gap ratio’ (PHEEGR) was developed.Results:Low income countries have occupied none of the leadership positions of chief editor or associate /assistant chief editors and middle income countries at maximum shared less than 5 percent. The PHEEGR gap in access to the different editorial positions between highest to the lowest representation of countries was 16/1 for chief editors, 12/1 for associate editors, 335/1 for editorial boards and 202/1 for associate editorial boards. However, after normalizing the data to the country’s population, the gap increased significantly.Conclusion:There is an imbalance and possibly even inequity in the composition of editorial boards and offices of international health journals that should be paid significant attention. This can contribute to fill the equity gap exists between health in developing and developed countries.
机译:背景:本文通过研究国际公共卫生期刊中不同国家的代表性,有助于进一步探索获得卫生研究能力发展方面的不平等现象。它还旨在检查这些期刊中存在的多样性程度。方法:本研究是描述性调查。该方法于2008年10月在ISI的37种健康期刊上进行了客观采样。确定了这些期刊不同编辑职位的人数和国籍。第二项分析涉及将每个国家获得的数字重新计算为每百万居民中国家的人口数量。为了更好地比较各国在期刊编辑团队中的存在情况,开发了“公共卫生编辑者公平差距比率”(PHEEGR)。结果:低收入国家没有担任主编或副研究员/助理总编辑和中等收入国家所占的比例最多不到5%。在国家最高代表与最低代表之间获得不同编辑职位的机会上,PHEEGR的差距为:主编为16/1,副编辑为12/1,编委会为335/1,副编委会为202/1。但是,将数据归一化为该国人口后,差距显着增加。结论:国际卫生期刊的编辑委员会和办公室组成不平衡,甚至可能存在不平等现象,应引起高度重视。这可以有助于填补发展中国家和发达国家卫生之间存在的公平差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号