...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research >A Comparison Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Form of Intramuscular ??eta-interferon I-a Versus the Reference Product: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Iran
【24h】

A Comparison Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Form of Intramuscular ??eta-interferon I-a Versus the Reference Product: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Iran

机译:肌内β-干扰素I-a与参考产品生物仿制药的疗效和安全性比较研究:伊朗的一项随机对照临床试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar form of beta-interferon-1a (Actovex) versus the reference product in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In a double blind, randomized phase 3 clinical trial, we evaluated 138 patients with RRMS that were allocated to receive the biosimilar medication and the reference treatment (30 ??g intramuscular, weekly for one year). We investigated changes in EDSS, relapse rate and MRI changes within one year. In sixty-nine patients who were allocated to each arm and analyzed mean age and its standard deviation was 32.4 ?± 8.8 and 31.5 ?± 8 for the biosimilar medication and the reference arm respectively. One-year follow-up revealed a mean difference of 0.084 in EDSS (95% CI: 0.069-0.237) between the two groups in favor of the biosimilar medication. This value did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.1. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse rate and systemic and local adverse events of the two groups. The results show that the biosimilar interferon 1-a is non-inferior to the reference product in terms of efficacy while it demonstrates comparable safety. In conclusion the biosimilar interferon 1-a can be considered as an effective and safe alternative to the reference product due to lower cost and more availability.
机译:我们比较了β-干扰素-1a(Actovex)与参考产品在复发性多发性硬化症(RRMS)治疗中的相似性和有效性。在一项双盲,随机3期临床试验中,我们评估了138例RRMS患者,这些患者被分配接受生物仿制药和参考治疗(30克肌肉注射,每周一次)。我们调查了一年内EDSS,复发率和MRI的变化。在分配给各组并分析平均年龄的69例患者中,生物仿制药和参考组的平均年龄分别为32.4±8.8和31.5±8。一年的随访显示,两组之间EDSS的平均差异为0.084(95%CI:0.069-0.237),而采用生物仿制药。该值未超过预定义的非劣性余量0.1。两组的复发率以及全身和局部不良事件均无统计学差异。结果表明,生物仿制药干扰素1-a在功效方面不逊于参考产品,同时证明了可比的安全性。总之,由于成本更低,可用性更高,生物仿制药干扰素1-a可以被视为参考产品的有效和安全替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号