首页> 外文期刊>International Journal Of The Commons >Institutions for sustainable forest governance: Robustness, equity, and cross-level interactions in Mawlyngbna, Meghalaya, India
【24h】

Institutions for sustainable forest governance: Robustness, equity, and cross-level interactions in Mawlyngbna, Meghalaya, India

机译:可持续森林治理的机构:印度梅加拉亚邦Mawlyngbna的稳健性,公平性和跨层次的互动

获取原文
       

摘要

This study adopts Ostrom’s Social-Ecological Systems (SES) framework in empirical fieldwork to explain how local forestry institutions affect forest ecosystems and social equity in the community of Mawlyngbna in North-East India. Data was collected through 26 semi-structured interviews, participatory timeline development, policy documents, direct observation, periodicals, transect walks, and a concurrent forest-ecological study in the village. Results show that Mawlyngbna's forests provide important sources of livelihood benefits for the villagers. However, ecological disturbance and diversity varies among the different forest ownership types and forest-based livelihood benefits are inequitably distributed. Based on a bounded rationality approach, our analysis proposes a set of causal mechanisms that trace these observed social-ecological outcomes to the attributes of the resource system, resource units, actors and governance system. We analyse opportunities and constraints of interactions between the village, regional, and state levels. We discuss how Ostrom’s design principles for community-based resource governance inform the explanation of robustness but have a blind spot in explaining social equity. We report experiences made using the SES framework in empirical fieldwork. We conclude that mapping cross-level interactions in the SES framework needs conceptual refinement and that explaining social equity of forest governance needs theoretical advances.
机译:这项研究在实地调查中采用了Ostrom的社会生态系统(SES)框架,以解释当地林业机构如何影响印度东北部Mawlyngbna社区的森林生态系统和社会公平。通过26次半结构化访谈,参与式时间表发展,政策文件,直接观察,期刊,样带走动以及村庄中同时进行的森林生态学研究,收集了数据。结果表明,毛林布纳州的森林为村民提供了重要的生计利益来源。但是,不同森林所有权类型之间的生态扰动和多样性各不相同,基于森林的生计利益分配不均。基于有限理性方法,我们的分析提出了一套因果机制,这些机制将这些观察到的社会生态结果追溯到资源系统,资源单位,参与者和治理系统的属性。我们分析了村级,区域级和州级之间互动的机会和约束。我们将讨论Ostrom的基于社区的资源治理的设计原理如何为鲁棒性提供解释,但在解释社会公平方面却有一个盲点。我们报告了在实地调查中使用SES框架取得的经验。我们得出结论,在SES框架中绘制跨层次的交互关系需要概念上的改进,而解释森林治理的社会公平性需要理论上的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号