首页> 外文期刊>International Journal Of The Commons >Cultural norms, cooperation, and communication: Taking experiments to the field in indigenous communities
【24h】

Cultural norms, cooperation, and communication: Taking experiments to the field in indigenous communities

机译:文化规范,合作与交流:在土著社区实地进行实验

获取原文
           

摘要

pExtensive experimental research has been devoted to the study of behaviour in laboratory settings related to public goods, common-pool resources, and other social dilemmas.  When subjects are anonymous and not allowed to communicate, they tend not to cooperate.  To the surprise of game theorists, however, simply allowing subjects to communicate in a laboratory setting enables them to achieve far more cooperative outcomes.  This finding has now been replicated in many laboratory experiments in multiple countries and in some initial field experiments.  Carefully conducted laboratory experiments do have strong internal validity.  External validity, however, requires further research beyond the initial field experiments that have already been conducted.  In this paper, we report on a series of common-pool resource field experiments conducted in eight indigenous communities in India that have very long traditions of shared norms and mutual trust.  Two experimental designs were used in all eight villages: a “no-communication” game that was repeated in ten rounds where no one was allowed verbal or written communication and a “communication game” in which the same five participants were allowed to communicate with each other at the beginning of each round before making their decisions.  The findings from these field experiments are substantially different from the findings of similar experiments conducted in experimental laboratories.  Subjects tended to cooperate in the first design even in the absence of communication.  The shared norms in these indigenous communities are so deeply embedded that communication is not needed to adopt cooperative decisions.  Communication does, however, tend to homogenize group and individual outcomes so that communities that are overly cooperative tend to reduce cooperation slightly and those with small deviations in the other direction tend to move toward the optimal solution./p
机译:>广泛的实验研究致力于研究实验室环境中与公共物品,公共场所资源和其他社会困境有关的行为。当受试者是匿名的并且不允许交流时,他们倾向于不合作。然而,令博弈论理论家感到惊讶的是,简单地让受试者在实验室环境中进行交流就可以使他们获得更多的合作成果。现在,该发现已在多个国家的许多实验室实验和一些初始现场实验中得到了重复。认真进行的实验室实验确实具有很强的内部有效性。但是,外部有效性需要在已经进行的初始现场试验之外进行进一步的研究。在本文中,我们报告了在印度的八个土著社区进行的一系列公共池资源现场实验,这些社区有着悠久的共享规范和互信的传统。在所有八个村庄中使用了两个实验性设计:一个“不交流”游戏,该游戏在十轮中重复进行,其中不允许任何人进行口头或书面交流;另一个“交流游戏”,其中相同的五个参与者被允许彼此交流其他人则在每个回合开始之前做出决定。这些现场实验的发现与实验实验室进行的类似实验的发现有很大不同。即使没有交流,受试者也倾向于在第一个设计中进行合作。这些土著社区的共同规范被深深地根深蒂固,以至于不需要采取交流就可以通过合作决策。但是,交流确实会使团体和个人的成果趋于同质,因此过度合作的社区倾向于略微减少合作,而在另一个方向上存在较小偏差的社区则倾向于朝着最佳解决方案发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号