首页> 外文期刊>Investigative Genetics >Pet fur or fake fur? A forensic approach
【24h】

Pet fur or fake fur? A forensic approach

机译:宠物皮草还是假皮草?法医方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Background In forensic science there are many types of crime that involve animals. Therefore, the identification of the species has become an essential investigative tool. The exhibits obtained from such offences are very often a challenge for forensic experts. Indeed, most biological materials are traces, hair or tanned fur. With hair samples, a common forensic approach should proceed from morphological and structural microscopic examination to DNA analysis. However, the microscopy of hair requires a lot of experience and a suitable comparative database to be able to recognize with a high degree of accuracy that a sample comes from a particular species and then to determine whether it is a protected one. DNA analysis offers the best opportunity to answer the question, ‘What species is this?’ In our work, we analyzed different samples of fur coming from China used to make hats and collars. Initially, the samples were examined under a microscope, then the mitochondrial DNA was tested for species identification. For this purpose, the genetic markers used were the 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA, while the hypervariable segment I of the control region was analyzed afterwards, to determine whether samples belonged to the same individual. Results Microscopic examination showed that the fibres were of animal origin, although it was difficult to determine with a high degree of confidence which species they belonged to and if they came from a protected species. Therefore, DNA analysis was essential to try to clarify the species of these fur samples. Conclusions Macroscopic and microscopic analysis confirmed the hypothesis regarding the analyzed hair belonging to real animals, although it failed to prove with any kind of certainty which actual family it came from, therefore, the species remains unknown. Sequence data analysis and comparisons with the samples available in GenBank showed that the hair, in most cases, belonged to the Canidae family, and in one case only to Felidae.
机译:背景技术在法医学中,涉及动物的犯罪种类很多。因此,对物种的鉴定已成为必不可少的调查工具。从此类犯罪中获得的证物通常对法医专家构成挑战。实际上,大多数生物材料都是痕迹,头发或鞣制的毛皮。对于头发样本,通常的取证方法应从形态和结构显微镜检查到DNA分析。但是,头发的显微镜检查需要大量经验和合适的比较数据库,以便能够高度准确地识别出样品来自特定物种,然后确定该样品是否为受保护物种。 DNA分析为回答“这是什么物种?”的问题提供了最佳机会。在我们的工作中,我们分析了来自中国的用于制造帽子和衣领的各种毛皮样品。最初,在显微镜下检查样品,然后测试线粒体DNA进行物种鉴定。为此目的,所使用的遗传标记是12S和16S核糖体RNA,随后分析了控制区域的高变区I,以确定样品是否属于同一个体。结果显微镜检查表明这些纤维是动物来源的,尽管很难高度确定它们属于哪个物种以及它们是否来自受保护物种。因此,DNA分析对于试图弄清这些毛皮样品的种类至关重要。结论宏观和微观分析证实了关于被分析的真实动物毛发的假说,尽管它不能以任何方式确定其真实的血统,因此该物种仍然未知。序列数据分析和与GenBank中可用样品的比较表明,在大多数情况下,头发属于Canidae家族,在一种情况下仅属于Felidae。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号