首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology >Neonatal tetanus in Sagamu, Nigeria during the Expanded Programme on Immunization and the National Programme on Immunization eras: A comparative analysis.
【24h】

Neonatal tetanus in Sagamu, Nigeria during the Expanded Programme on Immunization and the National Programme on Immunization eras: A comparative analysis.

机译:扩大免疫规划和国家免疫时代国家规划期间尼日利亚萨加穆市的新生儿破伤风:比较分析。

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: It is essential to continually study the pattern of occurrence of neonatal tetanus (NNT) for better control measures. Objective: To compare the prevalence rates and outcome of NNT in a Nigerian tertiary hospital over two periods characterized by different national immunization programmes - the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) and the National Programme on Immunization (NPI). Methods: The records of babies hospitalized with NNT between 1991 and 1996 (EPI period) and between 1997 and 2005 (NPI period) were studied. Results: The prevalence rates for the EPI and NPI periods were 6.4 percent and 2.9 percent respectively. Most of the mothers did not receive ante-natal care (81.4 percent for EPI and 75.6 percent for NPI), did not take anti-tetanus vaccines in pregnancy (87.7 percent for EPI and 88.4 percent for NPI) and delivered their babies outside the health facilities (86.6 percent for EPI and 83.3 percent for NPI). The Case Fatality Rate was 49.5 percent and 61.5 percent for the EPI and NPI periods respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence and mortality of NNT remains high in Nigeria despite a change in immunization programme. Introduction Over the years, studies have shown that neonatal tetanus (NNT) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the developing world. 1-3 As at 1999, Nigeria was listed as one of the three major countries in the whole world where NNT still constituted a major public health issue. 4 Several international interventions have been instituted to reduce this global burden but the persistence of NNT cases in clinical practice is evidence that the various interventions might have failed. NNT is said to have been eliminated from a country when the annual incidence is less than 1 per 1000 live births. 4, 5 Although, only 5 percent of NNT cases are actually reported to health services, 6 the incidence of NNT in Nigeria ranges between 14.6 and 20 per thousand live births. 7 Poor anti-tetanus coverage of women in the child-bearing age has been identified as a bane of successful elimination of NNT in the developing world. 6 One major step taken to address the problem of poor vaccine coverage in Nigeria was the replacement of the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) with the National Programme on Immunization (NPI) in 1997. 8 The former which was largely funded by donors like the WHO and the UNICEF presumably failed due to poor implementation arising from lack of governmental commitment. 8 Therefore, the funding of the latter was completely taken over by the Nigerian government to reflect governmental commitment to the immunization scheme and attract better implementation especially in terms of vaccine provision and delivery to the end-users. The targets included improved distribution of vaccines and increased community participation. 8 However, the programme, as far as anti-tetanus vaccination was concerned, remained clinic-based.Therefore, this study aims to compare the prevalence and outcome of NNT in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital over the two periods (spanning over 15 years) characterized by different immunization programmes in Nigeria. Methods A review of all neonates managed for tetanus at the Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital (OOUTH) Sagamu, Nigeria between January 1991 and December 2005 was carried out. The hospital provides specialist neonatal services to at least three states of the federation. Cases of NNT were defined according to the WHO criteria.9For the purpose of this study, the EPI period spanned January, 1991 to December 1996 while the NPI period spanned January 1997 to December 2005. The hospital records of the patients were studied and the information retrieved included the personal data, the clinical presentations, place of delivery, details of treatment, duration and outcome of hospitalization. Maternal data such as age, parity, place of antenatal care (ANC) and anti-tetanus immunization history were also recorded. Parental occupation and educati
机译:背景:持续研究新生儿破伤风(NNT)的发生模式对于更好的控制措施至关重要。目的:比较尼日利亚三级医院在以不同的国家免疫计划(扩展的免疫计划(EPI)和国家免疫计划(NPI))为特征的两个时期内NNT的患病率和结局。方法:研究1991年至1996年(EPI期)和1997年至2005年(NPI期)住院的NNT婴儿的记录。结果:EPI和NPI时期的患病率分别为6.4%和2.9%。大多数母亲没有得到产前护理(EPI为81.4%,NPI为75.6%),孕期未服用抗破伤风疫苗(EPI为87.7%,NPI为88.4%),并且在健康以外分娩了婴儿。设施(EPI为86.6%,NPI为83.3%)。 EPI和NPI期间的病死率分别为49.5%和61.5%。结论:尽管免疫计划有所变化,但尼日利亚的NNT患病率和死亡率仍然很高。简介多年来,研究表明,新生儿破伤风(NNT)是发展中国家新生儿发病率和死亡率的主要原因。 1-3截至1999年,尼日利亚被列为世界三大主要国家之一,在这些国家中,NNT仍然构成主要的公共卫生问题。 4已经采取了几种国际干预措施来减轻这种全球负担,但是NNT病例在临床实践中的持续存在证明了各种干预措施可能都失败了。据说,当一个国家的年发病率低于每千名活产婴儿中的1名时,NNT已从一个国家被淘汰。 4,5尽管实际上只有5%的NNT病例报告给卫生服务部门,[6]但在尼日利亚,NNT的发病率在每千活产14.6至20之间。 7育龄妇女抗破伤风覆盖率低被认为是发展中国家成功消除NNT的祸根。 6为解决尼日利亚疫苗覆盖率差的问题而采取的主要步骤是在1997年用国家免疫规划(NPI)取代了扩大免疫规划(EPI)。8前者主要由诸如世卫组织和儿童基金会大概是由于缺乏政府承诺而执行不力而失败。 8因此,后者的资金完全由尼日利亚政府接管,以反映政府对免疫计划的承诺并吸引更好的实施,特别是在疫苗供应和向最终用户提供方面。目标包括改善疫苗的分发和增加社区的参与。 8然而,就抗破伤风疫苗而言,该计划仍以临床为基础。因此,本研究旨在比较在两个时期(跨越15年)的尼日利亚教学医院中NNT的患病率和结果通过尼日利亚的不同免疫计划。方法回顾性分析了1991年1月至2005年12月在尼日利亚萨巴穆市的Olabisi Onabanjo大学教学医院(OOUTH)治疗破伤风的所有新生儿。医院为联邦的至少三个州提供专业的新生儿服务。根据世界卫生组织的标准确定了非传染性疾病的病例。[9]就本研究而言,EPI期为1991年1月至1996年12月,而NPI期为1997年1月至2005年12月。研究了患者的病历并提供了相关信息检索到的信息包括个人数据,临床表现,分娩地点,治疗细节,住院时间和结局。还记录了诸如年龄,胎次,产前检查地点(ANC)和抗破伤风免疫史等产妇数据。父母的职业和教育

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号