首页> 外文期刊>International Practice Development Journal >Realising participation within an action research project on two care innovation units providing care for older people
【24h】

Realising participation within an action research project on two care innovation units providing care for older people

机译:在两个为老年人提供护理的护理创新部门的行动研究项目中实现参与

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: On two care innovation units in the Netherlands, staff, students and lecturer practitioners work intensively together to provide care, create a rich learning environment, and to foster innovation and research. In striving to advance the quality of care and to develop person centred cultures, a preference is given to participative forms of research in which diverse experiences and different types of knowledge are valued. Aims and objectives: The research described here had two overarching aims: the improvement of practice situations and the encouragement of the integration of work and learning. This article focuses on our actions and learning with respect to fostering participation during this project. Design and methods: Within the action research methodology used, participative work-forms and research methods were chosen. For example, a responsive approach to evaluation of practice, use of narratives and the stimulation and use of creativity to help in exploring and sharing feelings, values and different forms of knowledge. In this article we use Arnstein’s (1969) ladder of citizen participation to frame our reflection on enabling participation within this project. Results: Participation took various forms and vacillated throughout the project. In addition to particular facilitation strategies, three factors emerged as influential in enabling or inhibiting aspects of participation among stakeholders: individual motivations and interests, the make-up of and atmosphere within the group, and the time made available to engage in research activities. Conclusions: Participation in research is both more complex and dynamic than Arnstein’s (1969) typology suggests. Moving ‘up’ the ladder may not be appropriate as a goal in and of itself. Instead, meeting and responding to each other’s situations, as stakeholders, seems a more appropriate focus. Taking responsibility, as facilitator, for certain research activities, can free other participants to focus on elements which interest them and from which they derive satisfaction.
机译:背景:在荷兰的两个护理创新部门,员工,学生和讲师从业人员紧密合作,以提供护理,创造丰富的学习环境并促进创新和研究。在努力提高护理质量和发展以人为本的文化时,偏爱参与式的研究形式,在这种形式中重视各种经验和不同类型的知识。目的和目标:这里描述的研究有两个总体目标:改善实践情况和鼓励工作与学习的融合。本文重点介绍我们在该项目期间促进参与的行动和学习。设计和方法:在所使用的行动研究方法论中,选择了参与性工作形式和研究方法。例如,采用一种响应性方法来评估实践,叙事以及刺激和创造力的使用,以帮助探索和分享感觉,价值和不同形式的知识。在本文中,我们使用阿恩斯坦(Arnstein,1969年)的公民参与阶梯来构想我们对实现该项目参与的思考。结果:参与采取了各种形式,并且在整个项目中都没有参与。除了特定的促进策略外,三个因素还可以影响或影响利益相关者参与的方面:个人动机和兴趣,小组成员的组成和氛围以及参与研究活动的时间。结论:参与研究比Arnstein(1969)的类型学建议更为复杂和动态。将阶梯“向上”移动本身可能并不适合作为目标。相反,作为利益相关者,面对面并回应彼此的情况似乎是更合适的重点。作为某些研究活动的促进者,承担责任可以使其他参与者解放出来,专注于自己感兴趣的要素并从中获得满足感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号