...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Women s Health >Safety and effectiveness of termination services performed by doctors versus midlevel providers: a systematic review and analysis
【24h】

Safety and effectiveness of termination services performed by doctors versus midlevel providers: a systematic review and analysis

机译:医生与中级医疗服务提供者提供的终止服务的安全性和有效性:系统的审查和分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Training midlevel providers (MLPs) to conduct surgical abortions and manage medical abortions has been proposed as a way to increase women's access to safe abortion. This paper reviews the evidence that compares the effectiveness and safety of abortion procedures administered by MLPs versus doctors.Methods: A systematic search was conducted of published trials and comparison studies assessing the effectiveness and/or safety of abortion provided by MLPs compared to doctors. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Popline were searched. The primary outcomes of interest were: (1) incomplete or failed abortion; and (2) measures of safety (adverse events and complications) of abortion procedures administered by MLPs and doctors. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each study. Data were synthesized in a narrative fashion.Findings: Five studies were included in this review (n = 8539 women), comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 3821) and three prospective cohort studies (n = 4718). In total, 4198 women underwent a procedure administered by an MLP, and 4341 women underwent a physician-administered procedure. Studies took place in the US, Nepal, South Africa, Vietnam, and India. Four studies used surgical abortion with maximum gestational ages ranging from 10 to 16+ weeks, while a medical abortion study had gestational ages up to 9 weeks. In RCTs, the effect estimates for incomplete or failed abortion for procedures performed by MLPs compared with doctors were OR = 2.00 (95% CI 0.85–4.68) for surgical abortion, and OR = 0.69 (95% CI 0.34–1.37) for medical abortion. Complications were rare among both provider types (1.2%–3.1%; OR = 1.80, 95% CI 0.83–3.90 for surgical abortions), and no deaths were reported.Conclusion: There were no statistical differences in incomplete abortion and complications for first trimester surgical and medical abortion up to 9 weeks performed by MLPs compared with physicians. Further studies are required to establish more precise effect estimates.
机译:目的:已建议培训中级提供者以进行手术流产和管理药物流产,以此作为增加妇女获得安全流产的途径。本文回顾了比较MLP与医生进行流产手术的有效性和安全性的证据。方法:对公开发表的试验和比较研究进行了系统搜索,评估了MLP与医生相比提供的流产的有效性和/或安全性。搜索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统,EMBASE,MEDLINE和Popline。感兴趣的主要结果是:(1)流产不完全或失败; (2)MLP和医生管理的流产手术的安全性(不良事件和并发症)措施。为每个研究计算赔率(OR)和它们的95%置信区间(CI)。结果以叙述方式进行了综合。结果:本评价包括五项研究(n = 8539名女性),包括两项随机对照试验(RCT)(n = 3821)和三项前瞻性队列研究(n = 4718)。总共有4198名妇女接受了MLP进行的手术,而4341名妇女接受了由医生进行的手术。研究在美国,尼泊尔,南非,越南和印度进行。有四项研究使用了人工流产,其最大胎龄在10至16+周之间,而医学流产研究的胎龄最高为9周。在RCT中,与人工流产相比,MLP进行的手术对不完全或失败流产的影响估计为:手术流产为OR = 2.00(95%CI 0.85–4.68),药物流产为OR = 0.69(95%CI 0.34–1.37) 。在这两种提供者类型中,并发症很少见(1.2%–3.1%; OR = 1.80,95%CI为0.83–3.90),无手术死亡的报道。结论:早孕不完全流产和并发症无统计学差异与医生相比,MLP进行了长达9周的手术和药物流产。需要进一步研究以建立更精确的效果估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号