...
首页> 外文期刊>Intestinal research. >Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Large Laterally Spreading Tumor: Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
【24h】

Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Large Laterally Spreading Tumor: Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

机译:内镜治疗策略:内镜小块粘膜切除术或内镜下粘膜下剥离术

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/Aims The therapeutic strategy between endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between EPMR and ESD in patients with large LST. Methods From July 2006 to September 2010, 106 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for large (>20 mm) LSTs were included in our retrospective analysis. Results Baseline characteristics of the patients and tumors were not different between two groups except for location (EPMR-right colon, ESD-rectum). The en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate were significantly higher in the ESD group than those in the EPMR group (EPMR vs. ESD, 53.5% vs. 88.6, P Conclusions The therapeutic strategy for choosing between EPMR and ESD for large LST lesions should be determined based on the macroscopic findings of their subtype. En bloc resection with ESD should be applied to LST-PDs due to their higher rate of submucosal invasion.
机译:背景/目的对于大的侧向扩散性肿瘤(LSTs),内镜小肠黏膜切除术(EPMR)和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)之间的治疗策略尚未明确。这项研究的目的是比较大型LST患者的EPMR和ESD的临床结局。方法回顾性分析2006年7月至2010年9月行106例大(> 20 mm)LSTs行内窥镜切除术的患者。结果两组患者和肿瘤的基线特征除了位置(EPMR-右结肠,ESD-直肠)外无差异。 ESD组的整体切除率和完全切除率显着高于EPMR组(EPMR vs. ESD,53.5%vs. 88.6,P)结论对于大LST病变,应选择EPMR和ESD的治疗策略LST-PDs由于其粘膜下浸润率较高,因此应采用带ESD的整块切除术来确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号