...
首页> 外文期刊>International Research Journal of Medical Sciences >Comparision of Alexander Technique versus Jacobson Relaxation Technique in Improving the Functional Activity of School Teachers with Mechanical Cervical Pain
【24h】

Comparision of Alexander Technique versus Jacobson Relaxation Technique in Improving the Functional Activity of School Teachers with Mechanical Cervical Pain

机译:亚历山大技术和雅各布森放松技术在改善机械性颈痛学校教师功能活动中的比较

获取原文

摘要

One of the most common musculoskeletal problems in now a days is mechanical neck pain. Survey shows that neck pain is common, about men and women are suffering with this problem. Causes includes minor injuries or sprains to muscle or ligament in neck. Neck pain is more common in people who spend much of their working day at a desk with a bent forward posture. Often the exact cause or origin of pain is not known. Prevalence is highest in middle age with women being affected more than men. The effectiveness of Alexander technique in minimizing the mechanical pain has been proved by many research workers. Very few studies exist comparing the effectiveness of relaxation method in minimizing the mechanical cervical pain. The aim of study is to compare the effectiveness of Alexander technique and Jacobson relaxation technique in inducing relaxation and improving the functional activity of individual with mechanical cervical pain. Simple Random Sampling Experimental design Sample size 40 Subjects Group A = 20 patients Group B = 20 Patients Setting done. Samples were selected into experimental group and control group with 40 subjects with mechanical cervical pain are taken as sample for this study and divided into two groups. The subjects with mechanical cervical pain are confirmed through the special test for cervical region. Radiological investigations should not reveal any degenerative changes. The tests should be negative like cervical compression test, cervical distraction test and Adson test. After the treatment section to both groups- data was analyzed.Comparison of pre and post Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) using Alexander technique shows pre NRS 7.4 and post NRS reduced to 2.25, gives t-value 17.1 thus giving significant result with p0.001.Comparison of pre and post NRS using Jacobson relaxation technique shows pre NRS 7.6 and post NRS reduced to 4, given t-value 19.6, thus giving a significant result with p0.001.Using Alexander technique and Jacobson relaxation technique in school teachers with mechanical cervical pain showed that both the interventions were effective in reducing pain intensity and improves the functional activity. This study predicts that group-A showed better improvement when compared to group-B.
机译:如今,最常见的肌肉骨骼问题之一是机械性颈部疼痛。调查显示,颈部疼痛是常见的,大约男女都在遭受这个问题的困扰。原因包括轻伤或扭伤脖子的肌肉或韧带。颈部疼痛在大多数工作时间以弯曲姿势坐在办公桌上的人中更为常见。通常,确切的疼痛原因或起源尚不清楚。中年的患病率最高,女性受累的程度比男性高。许多研究人员已经证明了亚历山大技术在最小化机械疼痛方面的有效性。很少有研究比较放松方法在最小化机械性宫颈疼痛方面的效果。研究的目的是比较亚历山大技术和雅各布森放松技术在诱发放松和改善患有机械性颈痛的人的功能活动中的有效性。简单随机抽样实验设计样本量40位受试者A组= 20位患者B组= 20位患者完成设置。将样本分为实验组和对照组,以40例患有机械性颈痛的受试者为研究样本,分为两组。通过特殊的宫颈区域检查可以确认患有机械性宫颈疼痛的受试者。放射学检查不应显示任何退行性变化。这些测试应该是阴性的,例如子宫颈压缩测试,子宫颈撑开测试和阿德森测试。对两组的治疗部分进行分析后,数据进行分析。使用Alexander技术对前后数字评分量表(NRS)进行比较,结果显示NRS之前为7.4,NRS后减少为2.25,得出t值17.1,因此得出显着结果,p0.001使用Jacobson松弛技术对NRS前后的比较显示,给定t值为19.6,NRS 7.6之前的NRS和还原后的NRS减少为4,因此p0.001的结果显着。在机械教师中使用Alexander技术和Jacobson松弛技术宫颈疼痛表明,两种干预措施均能有效减轻疼痛强度并改善功能活动。这项研究预测,与B组相比,A组表现出更好的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号