首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering >Policy interventions in watershed management: The case of the Inchaban Watershed, Ghana
【24h】

Policy interventions in watershed management: The case of the Inchaban Watershed, Ghana

机译:流域管理中的政策干预措施:以加纳Inchaban流域为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Before the twentieth century, watershed management in most Ghanaian communities relied solely on religious-based restrictions such as the use of taboos and sacred groves, to deter people from encroaching on watersheds. However, the advents of Christianity, western education, and urbanization, and the desire to develop the resources of the country have reduced the effectiveness and respect for traditional restrictions for the protection of the environment. Also, customary administration over watersheds has had a lot of challenges in evaluation and assessment of environmental damages, enforcement of laws to bring illegal land users to book, and integrating the rights of land users with policies on regulation and management. In the face of these numerous problems in the reliance on customary laws and practices, several watershed management policies have been consolidated with other key water sector policies such as the Water Use Regulation LI 1962, the Integrated Water Resource Management Policy (IWRMP) of 1996 and the National Water Vision Policy of 1997to streamline the administration over local watersheds. Despite these policies, many watersheds are still under the threat of degradation. This study identifies the reasons why the government has become unsuccessful to manage watersheds in the country. It used the Inchaban Watershed as a case, and solicited information using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions from 41 stakeholders or respondents who were selected purposively. The results of the study revealed that capacity of the management institutions to enforce the laws and policies set out by government was challenged due to problems of legal pluralism posed by local chiefs, some management and other institutions as well as individual local users of the Inchaban Watershed.
机译:在20世纪之前,大多数加纳社区的集水区管理完全依靠基于宗教的限制,例如使用禁忌和神圣的树林,以阻止人们入侵集水区。但是,基督教的出现,西方教育和城市化的发展以及对国家资源开发的渴望降低了有效性和对保护环境的传统限制的尊重。此外,流域的习惯管理在评估和评估环境损害,执行法律以使非法土地使用者入账以及将土地使用者的权利与管制和管理政策相结合方面面临许多挑战。面对依赖习惯法和惯例的众多问题,一些流域管理政策已与其他重要的水务部门政策合并在一起,例如1962年《 LI使用水条例》,1996年《水资源综合管理政策》(IWRMP)和1997年的《国家水远景政策》简化了对流域的管理。尽管采取了这些政策,许多流域仍然面临退化的威胁。这项研究确定了政府未能成功管理该国分水岭的原因。它以Inchaban分水岭为例,并通过有针对性地选择了41位利益相关者或受访者的深入访谈和焦点小组讨论来征集信息。研究结果表明,由于地方首长,一些管理部门和其他机构以及Inchaban分水岭的个别地方使用者造成的法律多元化问题,管理机构执行政府制定的法律和政策的能力受到了挑战。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号