...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Interobserver reliability on landmark-guided sacroiliac joint injection among 5th year residency in Orthopedic and Traumatology Department Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
【24h】

Interobserver reliability on landmark-guided sacroiliac joint injection among 5th year residency in Orthopedic and Traumatology Department Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

机译:印度尼西亚玛琅Brawijaya大学医学院骨科和创伤学系五年住院医师中标志性guide关节联合注射的观察者间可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The most common misdiagnosed low backpain is result from the sacroiliac joint. There are a lot of methods we can use to treat it such as steroid injection. This method can be done by using landmark-guided technique or image-guided. Unfortunately, not all hospital in this country has the same facility to do image-guided technique using fluoroscopy to do the injection. Therefore, landmark-guided technique still could be used for the treatment of choice. Methods: In this research, authors did injection on sacroiliac joint of 7 preserved cadavers, on both sacroiliac joint, injection were done by 2 operators, which both are 5th- year residents of Orthopedic and Traumatology Department using 2 coloring markers, therefore each of operator got 14 injection spots. Operator 1 uses methyl red, and operator 2 uses methylene blue. The success of the injection evaluated visually. If operator 1 achieved the injection, the sacroiliac joint would be bright red coloured. If operator 2 achieved the injection, the sacroiliac joint would be blue coloured. If both operator achieved the injection on the same joint, the mixture of both will be dark green coloured. Results: The result shown the success of both operator in doing injection for the sacroiliac joint is 9 joints (32.14%). There were 5 joints (17.86%) done by operator 1, and 4 joints (14.28%) done by operator 2. Operator 1 failed on 9 (32.14%) joints and operator 2 failed on 10 (35.72%) . The data was statistically analysed using Fisher Exact Test, result in p value 0.500 (p 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion there is no significantly different the success of the injection between operator 1 and 2. The failure of the injection on sacroiliac joint could be affected by many factors such as injection technique, and anatomy variations of the sample.
机译:背景:最常见的被误诊的低腰痛是由result关节引起的。我们可以使用很多方法来治疗它,例如类固醇注射。可以通过使用界标引导技术或图像引导来完成此方法。不幸的是,这个国家并非所有的医院都拥有使用荧光检查进行注射的图像引导技术的设施。因此,地标制导技术仍可用于治疗选择。方法:在这项研究中,作者对7个保存完的尸体的sa关节进行了注射,在两个cro关节上均由2名操作者进行注射,他们都是骨伤科5年级的居民,使用2种着色标记,因此每个操作者有14个注射点运算符1使用甲基红,运算符2使用亚甲基蓝。注射的成功通过视觉评估。如果操作员1完成注射,the关节将变成鲜红色。如果操作员2完成注射,the关节将为蓝色。如果两个操作员均在同一关节上完成注射,则两者的混合物将为深绿色。结果:结果显示,两个操作员成功完成injection关节注射手术的成功率为9个关节(32.14%)。操作员1完成5个关节(17.86%),操作员2完成4个关节(14.28%)。操作员1失败9个(32.14%)关节,操作员2失败10个(35.72%)。使用Fisher精确检验对数据进行统计分析,得出p值为0.500(p> 0.05)。结论:总之,操作员1和2之间的注射成功没有显着差异。sa关节注射失败可能受许多因素影响,例如注射技术和样本的解剖结构变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号