首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Comparative study of sonohysterosalpingography with hysterosalpingography for determination of tubal patency in infertile women
【24h】

Comparative study of sonohysterosalpingography with hysterosalpingography for determination of tubal patency in infertile women

机译:子宫输卵管造影与子宫输卵管造影确定不育妇女输卵管通畅性的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Ever since the history of mankind, human infertility has been a source of personal misery and social stigma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tubal factors of infertility, especially the tubal patency by SSG and HSG and study the advantages of both. Methods: The present work was undertaken in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Radiodiagnosis of Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi. 60 patients with primary or secondary infertility attending the OPD were selected over a period of 15 months (July 2008 to September 2009). Inclusion criteria: women of age 20-35 years with regular menstrual cycle whose male partners had no faults. Exclusion criteria: women with PID or other proven causes of infertility. All the patients were subjected to both SSG and HSG (interval period being 1 menstrual cycle) and the results compared in terms of tubal occlusion detection rate, detection of pelvic pathologies and complications of both the procedures. Results: Out of 60 cases, 70% (42) were of primary infertility and 30% (18) were of secondary infertility. History of reproductive tract infections was higher in secondary infertility group (44%). SSG appeared to be more sensitive in detection of tubal obstruction (35%) than HSG (30%), but the difference was statistically insignificant (p0.05). HSG could locate the exact site of tubal obstruction which was not evident in SSG. SSG was more sensitive in detection of associated pelvic pathologies (p = 0.05) like ovarian cyst, endometriosis and fibroid uterus. However, HSG was better in diagnosis of genital tuberculosis. 20% of patients complained of pelvic pain, bleeding, infection or allergic reaction during or after HSG, while only 7% of patients reported the same with SSG. Thus, SSG was superior to HSG in this respect (p = 0.02). Conclusions: SSG, though not a substitute, can be used as an alternative to HSG for assessment of tubal factors of infertility.
机译:背景:自人类历史以来,人类不育一直是个人痛苦和社会耻辱的根源。这项研究的目的是通过SSG和HSG评估输卵管不育因素,尤其是输卵管通畅性并研究两者的优势。方法:目前的工作是在兰契市拉金德拉医学科学研究所的妇产科和放射诊断科进行的。在15个月内(2008年7月至2009年9月),选择了60名患有OPD的原发性或继发性不育患者。纳入标准:月经周期为20-35岁的女性,其男性伴侣没有缺陷。排除标准:患有PID或其他已证明不育原因的女性。所有患者均接受SSG和HSG治疗(间隔期为1个月经周期),并比较了输卵管阻塞的检出率,盆腔病变的检出率和两种手术的并发症。结果:60例中,70%(42)为原发性不孕,30%(18)为继发性不孕。继发性不育组的生殖道感染史较高(44%)。 SSG似乎比HSG(30%)对输卵管阻塞的检测更为敏感(35%),但差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。 HSG可以找到输卵管阻塞的确切位置,这在SSG中不明显。 SSG在检测相关的盆腔病变(p = 0.05)(如卵巢囊肿,子宫内膜异位症和子宫肌瘤)时更为敏感。但是,HSG在生殖器结核的诊断中更好。 HSG期间或之后,有20%的患者抱怨骨盆疼痛,出血,感染或过敏反应,而只有7%的患者报告有SSG症状。因此,SSG在这方面优于HSG(p = 0.02)。结论:SSG虽然不能替代,但可以替代HSG来评估输卵管不育因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号