首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy: A four years retrospective study in tertiary care centre
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy: A four years retrospective study in tertiary care centre

机译:腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术,全腹子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术的比较:在三级护理中心进行的四年回顾性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Hysterectomy is one of the commonest gynaecological operations performed in India. Traditional surgical treatments performed are abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered “minimally invasive” surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. With the aid of laparoscopic procedure, a potential abdominal hysterectomy can be converted to a vaginal one and a difficult vaginal hysterectomy can be converted into a fairly simple vaginal hysterectomy. Aim of the present study is to compare above methods of hysterectomy in terms of operating time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay and complication, so as to provide best course of treatment to patient. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in tertiary care centre. Four-year data was collected from January 2012 to December 2016. Cases of LAVH with benign gynaecological condition and up to 12 weeks size uterus, without any associated medical condition were selected in study randomly, and compare with cases of NDVH, TAH in terms of duration of operative procedure, blood loss during surgery, and postoperative hospital stay. Results: In present study we found that average duration of procedure in LAVH was 84.35 minute, which was maximum compare to other method. Estimated blood loss in LAVH was least as compare to NDVH and TAH it was maximum. The average hospital stays in LAVH and NDVH was less as compared to TAH. Conclusions: LAVH should be considered a better approach in view of the relatively less blood loss and intraoperative complication. Due to lack of large randomized controlled trials, the role of Laparoscopic hysterectomy is difficult to define.
机译:背景:子宫切除术是印度最常见的妇科手术之一。进行的传统外科治疗是腹部子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术。阴道和腹腔镜手术被认为是“微创”手术方法,因为它们不需要大的腹部切口,因此与开放式子宫全子宫切除术相比,通常可缩短住院时间并缩短术后恢复时间。借助腹腔镜手术,可以将潜在的腹部子宫切除术转变为阴道子宫切除术,而将困难的阴道子宫切除术转变为相当简单的阴道子宫切除术。本研究的目的是就手术时间,估计的失血量以及术后住院时间和并发症方面比较上述子宫切除术的方法,从而为患者提供最佳治疗方案。方法:在三级护理中心进行回顾性观察研究。从2012年1月至2016年12月收集了四年数据。随机选择研究中有良性妇科疾病且子宫大小不超过12周,无任何相关医学疾病的LAVH患者,并与NDVH,TAH患者进行比较手术持续时间,手术中失血量以及术后住院时间。结果:在本研究中,我们发现LAVH的平均手术时间为84.35分钟,与其他方法相比最大。与NDVH和TAH相比,LAVH的估计失血量最少,而最大。与TAH相比,LAVH和NDVH的平均住院时间要少。结论:鉴于相对较少的失血量和术中并发症,LAVH应该被认为是一种更好的方法。由于缺乏大型随机对照试验,腹腔镜子宫切除术的作用难以确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号