首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Clinical and immunological responses of zidovudine lamivudine-nevirapine versus tenofovir lamivudine-efavirenz antiretroviral treatment among HIV-1 infected adults: Gandhi Hospital, Telangana, India
【24h】

Clinical and immunological responses of zidovudine lamivudine-nevirapine versus tenofovir lamivudine-efavirenz antiretroviral treatment among HIV-1 infected adults: Gandhi Hospital, Telangana, India

机译:齐多夫定拉米夫定-奈韦拉平与替诺福韦拉米夫定-依法韦仑抗逆转录病毒治疗在HIV-1感染成人中的临床和免疫反应:印度特兰甘纳邦甘地医院

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: HAART (Highly active antiretroviral therapy) is the cornerstone of management of patients with HIV infection. Antiretroviral therapy was started in the year 1986 with the first drug Zidovudine (ZDV). Later on, other antiretroviral drugs (NRTIs, NNRTIs and Pls) were introduced. Dual and mono therapies were used initially but the problem of resistance emerged. Currently, 3 or more ARV drugs are recommended globally for the treatment of people with HIV infection. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at a tertiary care Hospital over 200 patients, two commonly used medications are ZLN (Zidovudine+Lamivudine+Nevirapine) and TLE (Tenofovir+Lamivudine+Efavirenz ). The factors considered to affect the clinical and immunologic outcomes in both groups were assessed using baseline CD4 count, WHO clinical staging, presence of chronic diarrhea, anemia, and baseline weight, occurrence of TB, and switching of ART regimen. Results: A total of 200 patients were included in the study. ART documents of 100 patients are on Zidovudine+Lamivudine+Nevirapine) and 100 patients are on TLE (Tenofovir+Lamivudine+Efavirenz) regimen. Out of 200 patients, 97 were males and 103 were females. Maximum number of subjects were in the age of 15-45 years (82.5%) followed by 45 and above (17.5%). Mean age was 34.5±2.5 (years) with range 15 to 65 years. The baseline CD4 count of the patients, 94 were 350 and 6 were ≥350 on ZLN, in case of TLE 82 were 350 and 18 were ≥350. CD4 count after 6 months in 200 patients as follows, 60 were 350 and 40 were ≥350 in case of TLE 53 were 350 and 47 were ≥350. Conclusions: This research finding concluded that there is no critical difference between the two medications in regards to serious adverse events but did find that TDF is superior to AZT in terms of immunologic response and adherence and more frequent emergence of resistance.
机译:背景:HAART(高效抗逆转录病毒疗法)是管理HIV感染患者的基石。抗逆转录病毒疗法于1986年开始使用第一种药物齐多夫定(ZDV)。后来,引入了其他抗逆转录病毒药物(NRTI,NNRTI和Pls)。最初使用双重和单一疗法,但出现了耐药性问题。当前,全球推荐使用3种或更多抗逆转录病毒药物来治疗HIV感染者。方法:在一家三级医院对200例患者进行的横断面描述性研究,两种常用的药物是ZLN(齐多夫定+拉米夫定+ Nevirapine)和TLE(替诺福韦+拉米夫定+依非韦伦)。使用基线CD4计数,WHO临床分期,慢性腹泻,贫血和基线体重的存在,结核病的发生以及ART方案的转换来评估被认为影响两组临床和免疫结果的因素。结果:总共200名患者被纳入研究。 100例患者的抗逆转录病毒治疗文献采用齐多夫定+拉米夫定+尼维拉平治疗,而100例患者采用TLE(替诺福韦+拉米夫定+依非韦伦)治疗。在200例患者中,男性97例,女性103例。受试者人数上限为15-45岁(82.5%),其次是45岁及以上(17.5%)。平均年龄为34.5±2.5(年),范围为15至65岁。 ZLN患者的基线CD4计数为94(<350)和6(≥350),而TLE 82(350)和18(≥350)。 200例患者在6个月后的CD4计数如下,其中TLE 53 <350和47≥350的病例中,有60例<350,≥40≥350。结论:这项研究发现得出结论,两种药物在严重不良事件方面没有关键区别,但确实发现,在免疫反应和依从性以及耐药性更频繁出现方面,TDF优于AZT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号