首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Using item analysis on essay types questions given in summative examination of medical college students: facility value, discrimination index
【24h】

Using item analysis on essay types questions given in summative examination of medical college students: facility value, discrimination index

机译:对医学专科生总结考试中提出的论文类型题的项目分析:设施价值,歧视指数

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The most common tool used for assessment of knowledge is the essay questions. Their evaluations depend upon test and item analysis which is consisting of analysis of individual questions and analysis of the whole test. The objective of our study was to calculate the Item analysis (Facility value, FV and discrimination index, DI) of questions given in terminal examination of MBBS students and observes the adequacy of questions framing in examination. Methods: Study contains 150 medical students undergone terminal examination consist of questions of essay type, structured essay type and short answer questions were given to the students. We divide them into high ability group and low ability group. Mark range was decided for essay type, structured essay type and short answer type questions and FV & DI was calculated. Results: Studies described that facility values of 62.5 percentage questions were come under recommended & acceptable range and 50 percentage questions were come under acceptable range. Discrimination value of 100 percentage questions were come under recommended & acceptable range where 75 percentage questions were come under acceptable range. Conclusion: The importance of item analysis is highlighted from our results. For improvement of examination items with average difficulty and high discrimination should be implemented into future examinations to improve test scores and properly discriminate among the students.
机译:背景:用于评估知识的最常用工具是论文问题。他们的评估取决于测试和项目分析,其中包括对单个问题的分析和对整个测试的分析。我们研究的目的是计算在MBBS学生的期末考试中给出的问题的项目分析(设施价值,FV和歧视指数,DI),并观察考试中问题框架的充分性。方法:研究对象为150名接受终末考试的医学生,包括论文类型,结构化论文类型和简短答案。我们将他们分为高能力组和低能力组。确定论文类型,结构化论文类型和简答题的分数范围,并计算FV和DI。结果:研究表明,设施值的62.5%问题在建议的可接受范围内,而50%的问题在可接受的范围内。 100%问题的辨别值在建议和可接受的范围内,其中75%问题的歧视值在可接受范围内。结论:从我们的结果中突出了项目分析的重要性。为了提高平均难度和高度歧视性的考试项目,应在以后的考试中实施,以提高考试成绩并适当区分学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号