首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Immediate effect of dynamic oscillatory stretching vs. neurodynamic sliding technique on stretch tolerance, popliteal angle range and hamstring flexibility in apparently healthy individuals with hamstring tightness: a pre-post clinical trail
【24h】

Immediate effect of dynamic oscillatory stretching vs. neurodynamic sliding technique on stretch tolerance, popliteal angle range and hamstring flexibility in apparently healthy individuals with hamstring tightness: a pre-post clinical trail

机译:动态振荡拉伸与神经动力学滑动技术对明显健康的绳肌紧缩患者的拉伸耐受力,pop角范围和绳肌柔韧性的即时影响:一项临床前研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The hamstrings being postural muscles are prone to tightness which leads to muscular imbalances and inefficiency of daily living activities. Hence, the present study aims to compare two competent techniques Dynamic Oscillatory Stretching (DOS)vs. neurodynamic sliding (NDS) technique. Methods: A Total of 60 subjects were recruited (31 males, 29 females). passive 90-90 knee extension test, modified v sit to reach test and NPRS scale were used to evaluate the range, flexibility and stretch tolerance in participants pre intervention and were allotted into Group A (DOS) and Groups B. The subjects were then re-assessed immediately post intervention. Results: The results were obtained using the independent and dependent t-tests. Post intervention results were suggestive of a significant within group result with a p=0.0001 under all the parameters. Subjects in Group a showed a greater increase in the ROM while, Group B showed a better result in flexibility and stretch tolerance. Conclusions: Both the techniques are efficient and can be incorporated in sports rehabilitation to prevent on site injury thereby improving athlete’s performance.
机译:背景:腿筋是姿势性肌肉,容易产生紧绷感,从而导致肌肉失衡和日常生活活动效率低下。因此,本研究旨在比较动态振动拉伸(DOS)与两种有效技术。神经动力滑动(NDS)技术。方法:共招募了60名受试者(男31例,女29例)。被动90-90膝关节伸展试验,改良坐姿测验和NPRS量表用于评估参与者在干预前的范围,柔韧性和伸展耐力,并将其分为A组(DOS)和B组。 -干预后立即进行评估。结果:使用独立和相关的t检验获得结果。干预后的结果表明,在所有参数下,组内结果均具有显着性,p = 0.0001。 A组受试者的ROM增大更大,而B组受试者的柔韧性和拉伸耐受性更好。结论:这两种技术都是有效的,可用于运动康复中,以防止现场受伤,从而提高运动员的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号