...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Preventive Medicine >Reasons for Smoking Among Male Teenagers in Tehran, Iran: Two Case-Control Studies Using Snowball Sampling
【24h】

Reasons for Smoking Among Male Teenagers in Tehran, Iran: Two Case-Control Studies Using Snowball Sampling

机译:伊朗德黑兰男性青少年吸烟的原因:两项使用雪球采样的病例对照研究

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: Identifying the underlying factors contributing to smoking among teenagers is important in establishing smoking control programs. The present study was designed to identify and compare factors revealed in a preceding qualitative study conducted on 13-15 year-old boys living in two different socio-economic districts in the Northern and Southern parts of Tehran. Methods: Two completely similar case-control studies, each with 200 subjects, were conducted using a snowball sampling. The case and control subjects were matched based on the intimacy relations, i.e. six smokers were recruited in each of the Northern and Southern districts; they were then asked to introduce one of their smoker friends as a case and a non-smoker one as a control. Results: Multi-variable conditional logistic regression revealed that having a smoker father is the single effective factor in the two districts. As for boys living in the Northern (wealthier) part of the city, social capital (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43-0.81) played a protective role against smoking, whereas quitting home after a quarrel (OR: 15.07, 95% CI: 1.54-147.25), monthly allowance (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.29-3.82) and hyperactivity (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 2.64-240.45) were associated with a higher risk of becoming a smoker. Conclusions: The studied variables can be classified as personal, familial, and school-level factors. Familial intervention is effective for all the factors which revealed to be influential on the risk of becoming a smoker. It could be concluded that interventions on the family level should be used to prevent the cigarette use in Tehran.
机译:目标:确定导致青少年吸烟的潜在因素对于建立吸烟控制计划很重要。本研究旨在确定和比较先前的定性研究中揭示的因素,该研究对居住在德黑兰北部和南部两个不同社会经济区的13-15岁男孩进行。方法:使用雪球采样进行了两个完全相似的病例对照研究,每个研究对象均为200名受试者。根据亲密关系对病例和对照对象进行匹配,即在北部和南部各地区招募了六名吸烟者;然后要求他们介绍他们的一个吸烟者朋友作为案例,并介绍一个不吸烟的朋友作为对照。结果:多变量条件logistic回归显示,有吸烟父亲是两个地区的唯一有效因素。至于居住在城市北部(较富裕)的男孩,社会资本(OR:0.59,95%CI:0.43-0.81)起到了预防吸烟的作用,而吵架后就离家了(OR:15.07,95% CI:1.54-147.25),每月津贴(OR:2.22,95%CI:1.29-3.82)和多动症(OR:1.69,95%CI:2.64-240.45)与吸烟者风险较高相关。结论:研究的变量可分为个人,家庭和学校水平因素。家族干预对显示出影响吸烟者风险的所有因素均有效。可以得出结论,应该在家庭一级采取干预措施,以防止在德黑兰使用香烟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号