首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >The Governance, Structure and Management Processes of an Emergent Goal-directed Organizational Network: an Evaluation of a Configurational Framework of Goal-directed Networks
【24h】

The Governance, Structure and Management Processes of an Emergent Goal-directed Organizational Network: an Evaluation of a Configurational Framework of Goal-directed Networks

机译:新兴的目标导向型组织网络的治理,结构和管理过程:对目标导向型网络配置框架的评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Whole networks, defined as three or more autonomous organizations collectively working together to achieve not only their individual organizational goals, but also a common network goal[i] are argued to be the appropriate approach to address wicked problems[ii]. These networks, either emergent or mandated, are complex systems, hence understanding how they can be effective is also a complex endeavor[iii]. Especially in the context of emergent networks two issues are central. The first issue is what drives the development and effectiveness of the network, and second what holds the network together without the presence of a mandate, unity in command and ownership? In this article the authors conducted an in-depth case study of an emergent whole network in Flanders, Belgium. In particular, the focus was on the combination of three integration mechanisms: network governance, structure and management processes to explain what drives the development, integration and effectiveness of this network. The authors propose to use a configurational framework taking into account not only isolated effects of network characteristics, but also, as recent literature suggests, conceptualizing whole networks as clusters of structures and practices[iv]. The contribution of this article is threefold. First, this article advances our understanding on how whole networks organize the joint action of various organizations in the network. In particular, we contribute to the literature on emergent whole networks in a developmental phase[v]. Second, we evaluate a configurational framework of whole networks that allows for causal complex recipes of explaining network effectiveness. Third and especially relevant for practitioners and administrators, the authors discuss whether the particular combination of network governance, network structure and management processes in the emergent network explains whether the network was perceived effective by the network members and constituents as a whole in delivering the requisite care and support to multi-problem clients in a region of Flanders, Belgium. The implication of this article is that developing “the whole network” into a most appropriate and effective system of service delivery requires not only to bring together diverse set of organizations, but instead necessitates a purposively organization of network governance, structure and management processes. It is important to mention that our inferences are limited by our single case study approach at a single point in time. References : 1- Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. Interorganizational networks at the network level. A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of management, 2007;33(3):479-516. 2- Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2008;18(2):229-252. 3- Alter, C., & Hage, J. Organizations working together (Vol. 191). Sage Publications, Inc. 1993. 4- Raab, J., Lemaire, R., & Provan, K.G. (). The Configurational Approach in Organizational Network Research. In Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, edited by Peer C. Fiss, Bart Cambré and Axel Marx. Emerald Group Publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 2013;38: 225-253. 5- Kenis, P., Provan, K.G., (). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 2009;87(3):440-456.
机译:整个网络被定义为三个或更多个自治组织共同协作,不仅实现其各自的组织目标,而且实现共同的网络目标[i]是解决邪恶问题[ii]的适当方法。这些网络,无论是紧急的还是强制性的,都是复杂的系统,因此了解它们如何有效也是一项复杂的工作[iii]。特别是在紧急网络的情况下,两个问题是中心问题。第一个问题是什么驱动着网络的发展和有效性,第二个问题是在没有任务授权,指挥统一和所有权的情况下将网络保持在一起?在本文中,作者对比利时法兰德斯一个新兴的整个网络进行了深入的案例研究。特别是,重点放在三种集成机制的组合上:网络治理,结构和管理过程,以解释驱动该网络发展,集成和有效性的因素。作者建议使用配置框架,不仅要考虑网络特征的孤立影响,而且要考虑到最新文献所建议的将整个网络概念化为结构和实践的集群[iv]。本文的贡献是三方面的。首先,本文提高了我们对整个网络如何组织网络中各个组织的联合行动的理解。特别是,我们为处于发展阶段的新兴整个网络的文献做出了贡献[v]。其次,我们评估整个网络的配置框架,该框架允许解释网络有效性的因果关系复杂配方。第三点,特别是对从业者和管理者而言,作者讨论了新兴网络中网络治理,网络结构和管理过程的特定结合是否解释了网络成员和整体成员是否认为网络在提供必要的照护方面是有效的为比利时法兰德斯地区的多问题客户提供支持。本文的含义是,将“整个网络”发展成最合适,最有效的服务交付系统不仅需要集合各种组织,而且还必须有针对性地组织网络治理,结构和管理流程。值得一提的是,我们的推论受到我们在单个时间点的单一案例研究方法的限制。参考:1- Provan,K. G.,Fish,A.和Sydow,J.网络级别的组织间网络。整个网络的经验文献综述。管理学报,2007; 33(3):479-516。 2- Provan,K. G.和Kenis,P.网络治理模式:结构,管理和有效性。公共行政研究与理论杂志,2008; 18(2):229-252。 3- Alter,C.和&Hage,J.一起工作的组织(第191卷)。 Sage Publications,Inc.1993。4-Raab,J.,Lemaire,R.,&Provan,K.G. ()。组织网络研究中的配置方法。 Peer C. Fiss,BartCambré和Axel Marx编辑的《组织研究中的配置理论与方法》。翡翠集团出版。组织社会学研究2013; 38:225-253。 5-Kenis,P.,Provan,K.G.,()。走向公共网络绩效的外生理论。公共管理,2009; 87(3):440-456。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号