...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Enacting integrated care in the system-wide social and health care reform in Finland
【24h】

Enacting integrated care in the system-wide social and health care reform in Finland

机译:在芬兰的全系统社会和医疗改革中实施综合护理

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : This research in progress studies the enactment of integrated care in the system-wide social and health care reform suggested by the government of Finland. In the new model the responsibility for organising social and health care will be transferred from the municipalities to the eighteen new counties, while the service delivery will be the responsibility of public, private and third sector organisations. The counties will have the responsibility for defining the service packages and chains on the basis of the needs of different client groups. The challenge for integrated care is that there will be multiple service providers from whose services a client’s service package or chain can be composed of. The preparation of the implementation of the model has started in the preliminary county organisations, while the new counties are planned to start their activity in January 2021. Theory and Methods : This research studies the social and health care system as systemic practices that constitute and mold each other. A model is studied as a script that defines the elements of a practice and their relations. A model is locally translated and adapted into practice. This research is based on a multi-case study setting which studies the implementation process in five counties. This first part of the research analysed during 2018 the strategies and means for defining the service packages and chains within five county organizations..Official public documents were analysed and thematic dialogues with the temporary county organisations were carried out. Results and discussion : There was uncertainty among the counties concerning what the government means by the service packages and chains. Every county had chosen the life span model as a ground for defining the service packages and chains: children and families, adults of working age, and elderly. Within this model definition of different sub-segments was under consideration. The challenge concerned especially how to identify the clients who need several different services. The present public service providers were extensively involved in the definition practices in every county, while there were differences between the counties who, organiser or provider, was leading the definition practice. The different client groups were heard in different occasions and forums in the counties, but they were not participating in the actual definition practices. Conclusions and lessons learnt : The counties were preparing the service packages and chains in extreme uncertainty because the suggested laws were not accepted in the parliament yet. So far they were in the beginning of the definition work. Segmentation, defining the service packages and chains on the basis of the needs of client groups, multifaceted utilization of knowledge, and above all the role of the counties as an organizer of services were new things which required time and learning. Limitations and suggestions for future research : This research defines generic socio-technical elements to be taken into account when implementing new models of integrated care. Later it will analyse how the way the service packages and chains have been defined constitutes preconditions, possibilities and challenges for enacting person-centered integrated care by the service providers.
机译:简介:这项正在进行的研究研究了芬兰政府建议的综合护理在全系统社会和医疗保健改革中的实施。在新模式中,组织社会和卫生保健的责任将从市政当局转移到18个新县,而提供服务将由公共,私营和第三部门组织负责。各县将负责根据不同客户群体的需求定义服务包和服务链。集成护理的挑战在于,将有多个服务提供商可以组成客户的服务包或链。该模型的实施准备工作已在县的初步组织中开始,而新县计划在2021年1月开始活动。彼此。模型被作为脚本来研究,该脚本定义了实践的要素及其关系。将模型本地翻译并应用于实践。本研究基于多案例研究设置,该案例研究了五个县的实施过程。该研究的第一部分分析了2018年在五个县级组织中定义服务包和链的策略和方法。分析了官方的公共文件,并与临时县级组织进行了主题对话。结果与讨论:各县之间对于政府通过服务包和连锁店的含义表示什么尚不确定。每个县都选择了寿命模型作为定义服务包和服务链的基础:儿童和家庭,工作年龄的成年人和老年人。在该模型中,正在考虑对不同的细分市场进行定义。挑战尤其涉及如何确定需要几种不同服务的客户。目前的公共服务提供者广泛参与了每个县的定义实践,而领导定义实践的县(组织者或提供者)之间存在差异。在县的不同场合和论坛中听到了不同的客户群,但是他们没有参加实际的定义实践。结论和经验教训:各县正准备在极度不确定的情况下提供服务包和服务链,因为建议的法律尚未在议会中接受。到目前为止,它们只是定义工作的开始。细分,根据客户群体的需求定义服务包和链,知识的多方面利用以及最重要的是,县作为服务组织者的作用是需要时间和学习的新事物。未来研究的局限性和建议:本研究定义了在实施新的综合护理模式时要考虑的一般社会技术要素。稍后,它将分析服务包和链的定义方式如何构成服务提供商实施以人为中心的综合护理的前提条件,可能性和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号