首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Meeting boundaries - An empirically grounded reflection on the contribution of meeting events to changing political, social and personal conceptions of mental health.
【24h】

Meeting boundaries - An empirically grounded reflection on the contribution of meeting events to changing political, social and personal conceptions of mental health.

机译:满足界限-基于经验的会议活动对不断变化的政治,社会和个人心理健康观念的贡献的反思。

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper is an empirically grounded argument in which meetings are considered as events linking differences (Luhmann 2006) and thus contributing to the ongoing displacement of boundaries between self and system, and between system and environment. It draws on a research that aimed to evaluate a mental health reform in the Brussels Region (Belgium), through professional and organizational practices subsequent to a shift from institutionalized to community-based mental health care. A key objective underlying this reform is the inclusion of service users within wider society. This research was specifically designed to understand the relationship between organizational changes and services users’ care and social trajectories. It drew focus on the trajectories of people in particularly vulnerable situations, including homeless and migrant populations, as well as users suffering from mental illness and addiction problems. The research methods were designed to gather a diversity of mental health service users and professionals through meeting events (Schwartzman 1989, Freeman 2008, Duffy 2016). It combined the use of focus groups (n=4), ethnographic meetings (n=9), semi-structured interviews (n=15) and informal discussions, which aimed either to prepare the focus groups or to deepen a question raised by group discussions. Circulating through meetings enables participants, from contrasting professional status and with diverse experiences with mental health services, to meet different ways of viewing the world and of understanding mental health. As a result, participant interactions in a given setting create meetings events, construed as interrelated systems of communication (Thunus & Walker 2018), allowing for opportunities to observe and make sense of individual narratives and the social context in which they unfold in a new light. Processing newly observed differences entails the continuous displacement of boundaries within and surrounding meetings. This paper discusses how the research process focusing on meetings contributes to displacing boundaries between self, system and environment. Based on a qualitative, thematic analysis of empirical data collected through meeting events, it evidences that the research process supported incremental changes in researchers, professionals as well as users’ perspectives on the very meaning of mental health, on the care system being assessed, and on the political objective of social inclusion. Specific attention is drawn to the internationally relevant question of mental health and occupation (Eu compass for action on mental health and well-being, 2016), which dominates the research results. In this respect, this paper demonstrates that meeting gathering professionals and users with different experiences and backgrounds, which usually prevent them from meeting together, enables the emergence of an alternative conception of the question of mental health and occupation. This conception entails a clear call to shift from curative to preventive policies. To conclude, this paper thus outlines a future research aiming to raise the question of mental health and occupation at the European level, through gathering participants with different health conditions and from diverse socio-economic status.
机译:本文是基于经验的论证,其中会议被视为联系差异的事件(Luhmann 2006),从而促进了自我与系统之间,系统与环境之间边界的不断移位。它借鉴了一项旨在评估布鲁塞尔地区(比利时)的精神卫生改革的研究,该研究是通过从机构化到基于社区的精神卫生保健之后的专业和组织实践进行的。这项改革的主要目标是将服务使用者纳入更广泛的社会。这项研究是专门为了解组织变革与服务使用者的照料和社会轨迹之间的关系而设计的。它着重介绍了特别脆弱的人群,包括无家可归者和移民人口,以及遭受精神疾病和成瘾问题的使用者的发展轨迹。研究方法旨在通过会议活动来收集各种心理健康服务用户和专业人员(Schwartzman 1989,Freeman 2008,Duffy 2016)。它结合了焦点小组(n = 4),人种学会议(n = 9),半结构化访谈(n = 15)和非正式讨论的使用,旨在准备焦点小组或加深小组提出的问题讨论。通过会议循环,参加者可以从不同的职业状况以及在心理健康服务方面的不同经验,以不同的方式来了解世界和了解心理健康。结果,参与者在给定环境中的互动产生了会议事件,被解释为相互联系的交流系统(Thunus&Walker 2018),从而使人们有机会观察和理解个人叙事以及它们以新的视角展现的社会背景。 。要处理新观察到的差异,就必须不断转移会议内部和周围的边界。本文讨论了专注于会议的研究过程如何有助于消除自我,系统与环境之间的界限。基于对通过会议活动收集的经验数据的定性,主题分析,证明研究过程支持了研究人员,专业人员以及用户对心理健康的意义,所评估的护理系统以及用户的观点的不断变化。社会包容的政治目标。特别注意国际上有关精神健康和职业的问题(欧盟关于精神健康和福祉的指南针,2016年),该问题主导了研究结果。在这方面,本文表明,与具有不同经验和背景的专业人士和用户会面通常会阻止他们聚会,这使人们对心理健康和职业问题有了新的认识。这一概念需要明确呼吁从治疗政策转向预防政策。总而言之,本文概述了未来的研究,旨在通过聚集具有不同健康状况和不同社会经济地位的参与者来提出欧洲一级的精神健康和职业问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号