首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >How Do Patients Perform in Establishing Informational Continuity of Care during Multi-Institutional Readmission in Rural China?
【24h】

How Do Patients Perform in Establishing Informational Continuity of Care during Multi-Institutional Readmission in Rural China?

机译:中国农村地区多机构再入院期间患者在建立护理信息连续性方面的表现如何?

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : Multi-institutional readmission refers to a 30-day readmission from one medical institution to another at different levels for the same disease. How patients transfer information is particularly important in rural China, because the doctors seldom communicate and the information system is not interconnected. This study focused on patients readmitted from township hospital to county hospital, and described how patients disclosed the information details. Methods : We screened the databases of the Medical System in 5 counties distributed in East, Central and Western China in 2013, and matched 439 pairs of medical record for multi-institutional-readmitted patients with respiratory or cerebrovascular diseases. And 2 independent medical specialists evaluated the records. Descriptive analysis and χ2 test was implied to analyze factors attributed to discontinuity. Results : A quarter of the patients did not mention their experience before readmission. 68.2% of the information mentioned was useful in the views of the specialists. More than half of the patients mentioned previous institutions and treatments, while 28.5% and 12.5% mentioned the diagnosis and the medication. Patients by referral talked about their conditions less than those readmitted voluntarily. The longer the readmission interval was, the less information passed. Discussion : Most patients were not well-educated and can’t remember the useful but professional information. Standardized medical records and effective information technology should be emphasized. The pattern and readmission interval had greater impact on patients. Conclusions : Patients did not perform well in establishing informational continuity. Lessons learned : Patients should raise their consciousness, and interconnected information system need to be constructed. Limitations : Field observation did not adopted, so the actual process was not clear. Suggestions : How to raise patients’ awareness and the management mechanism of referral should be further studied.
机译:简介:多机构再入院是指同一疾病从一家医疗机构到不同级别的另一家医疗机构进行的30天再入院。在中国农村地区,患者如何传输信息尤为重要,因为医生很少交流且信息系统没有互连。这项研究集中于从乡镇医院转入县医院的患者,并描述了患者如何披露信息细节。方法:我们筛选了2013年分布在中国东部,中部和西部的5个县的医疗系统数据库,并匹配了439对多机构重新录入的呼吸道或脑血管疾病患者的病历。并有2位独立的医学专家对记录进行了评估。描述性分析和χ2检验暗示了分析不连续性的因素。结果:四分之一的患者在重新入院前没有提及自己的经历。提到的信息中有68.2%在专家看来是有用的。超过一半的患者提到过以前的机构和治疗方法,而分别有28.5%和12.5%提到了诊断和用药。转诊患者谈论自己的病情要比自愿转诊者少。重新提交间隔越长,传递的信息越少。讨论:大多数患者受过良好的教育,不记得有用但专业的信息。应强调规范的病历和有效的信息技术。方式和再次入院间隔对患者的影响更大。结论:患者在建立信息连续性方面表现不佳。经验教训:患者应提高意识,需要建立相互联系的信息系统。局限性:没有采用现场观察,因此实际过程不清楚。意见建议:应进一步研究如何提高患者的意识和转诊的管理机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号