首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery >A comparison of low-risk womens birth outcomes and experiences in different sized midwifery practices in The Netherlands
【24h】

A comparison of low-risk womens birth outcomes and experiences in different sized midwifery practices in The Netherlands

机译:在荷兰不同规模的助产士实践中低风险妇女的出生结局和经验的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

To examine maternal birth outcomes and birth experiences of low-risk women in the Netherlands in different sized midwifery practices. Descriptive study was using postal questionnaires six weeks after the estimated due date. Women were recruited from urban, semi-rural and rural areas from small-sized practices (1-2 midwives), medium-sized practices (3-4 midwives) or large-sized practices (5 or more). 718 Dutch speaking women with uncomplicated pregnancies, a representative sample of women in 143 midwifery practices in the Netherlands who had given birth in the period between 20 April and 20 May 2007. Distribution of place of birth categories and intervention categories, birth experience, woman-midwife relationship and presence of own midwife after referral. Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Women in practices with a maximum of two midwives were significantly more likely to experience lower rates of referral, interventions in general and specifically pain relief by means of pethidine, CTG registration and unplanned caesarean sections. Women with a maximum of two midwives were significantly more likely to know their midwife or midwives and were more frequently supported by their own midwife after referral in comparison to women in practices with more than two midwives. The presence of the woman’s own midwife added value to the birth experience. Women with a maximum of two midwives had higher levels of a positive birth experience than women in practices with more than two midwives. Midwifery practices with a maximum of two midwives contribute to non-interventionist birth and a positive birth experience. Awareness of the study results and further study is recommended to discuss re-organisation?of care in order to achieve significant reductions on referral and interventions during childbirth and positive maternal birth experiences.
机译:在不同规模的助产士实践中检查荷兰低危妇女的孕产结果和出生经历。描述性研究是在预计到期日后六周使用邮政问卷。从城市,半农村和农村地区招募妇女的方法有小型做法(1-2名助产士),中型做法(3-4名助产士)或大型做法(5名或以上)。 718名讲简单妊娠的荷兰语妇女,在2007年4月20日至5月20日期间在荷兰进行的143次助产实践中有代表性的妇女样本。出生地类别和干预类别的分布,出生经历,妇女-接生后助产士的关系和自己的助产士的存在。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)分析数据。最多有两名助产士的妇女,通过哌替啶,CTG登记和计划外的剖腹产手术的转诊率,一般干预措施以及特别是缓解疼痛的可能性明显降低。与拥有两名以上助产士的妇女相比,最多有两名助产士的妇女更容易认识自己的助产士或助产士,并且在转诊后更容易获得自己的助产士的支持。女人自己的助产士的存在为分娩经历增添了价值。最多有两名助产士的妇女比有两名以上助产士的妇女有较高的积极生育经验。最多两名助产士的助产习俗有助于非干预性出生和积极的出生经历。建议了解研究结果并进行进一步研究,以讨论医疗的重组,以便在分娩和积极的孕产妇经历方面大幅减少转诊和干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号