...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Two-year Outcome of Turkish Patients Treated with Zotarolimus Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stents in an Unselected Population with Coronary Artery Disease in the Real World: A Prospective Non-randomized Registry in Southern Turkey
【24h】

Two-year Outcome of Turkish Patients Treated with Zotarolimus Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stents in an Unselected Population with Coronary Artery Disease in the Real World: A Prospective Non-randomized Registry in Southern Turkey

机译:现实世界中未选择的患有冠状动脉疾病的未选定人群中接受佐他莫司与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗的土耳其患者的两年结局:土耳其南部的前瞻性非随机登记

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Our purpose was to investigate the clinical outcomes of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in Turkish patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In general, the outcome of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement has a proven efficacy in randomized trials. However, the difference in efficacy between the Zotarolimus and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in unselected Turkish patients is controversial. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of these two drug-eluting stents in the real-world. Methods: We created a registry and prospectively analyzed data on a consecutive series of all patients who presented to our institution with symptomatic coronary artery disease between February 2005 and March 2007 and who were treated with the zotarolimus- or the paclitaxel-eluting stent. The follow-up period was approximately two years. The primary end-point was major cardiac events, and the secondary end-point was definite stent thrombosis. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee. Results: In total, 217 patients were treated with either the zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 116) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 101). The lesions in the 2 arms of the study were treated similarly by conventional technique. At 24-month follow-up the paclitaxel-eluting stent group showed significantly higher non-Q wave myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 5.9%, p: 0.02), Q wave myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 5.9%, p: 0.049), coronary artery binding graft surgery (2.6% vs 6.9%, p: 0.002), and late stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 3.9%, p: 0.046). Conclusions: Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrated better clinical outcomes than Paclitaxel-eluting stents in a daily routine practice of coronary intervention in an unselected Turkish population.
机译:背景:我们的目的是研究佐他莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架在土耳其冠心病(CAD)患者中的临床效果。一般而言,药物洗脱支架(DES)放置的结果在随机试验中已证明具有疗效。但是,在未经选择的土耳其患者中,佐他莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架之间的疗效差异存在争议。因此,我们在现实世界中研究了这两种药物洗脱支架的临床疗效。方法:我们创建了一个注册中心,并对2005年2月至2007年3月期间就诊于我们症状性冠状动脉疾病并接受佐他莫司或紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗的所有患者的一系列连续研究进行了前瞻性分析。随访期约为两年。主要终点为主要心脏事件,次要终点为明确的支架血栓形成。获得所有受试者的知情同意,并且研究方案经当地伦理委员会批准。结果:总共有217例患者接受了佐他莫司洗脱支架(n = 116)或紫杉醇洗脱支架(n = 101)的治疗。用常规技术相似地治疗研究的两个臂中的病变。在24个月的随访中,紫杉醇洗脱支架组显示出更高的非Q波心肌梗死(2.6%vs 5.9%,p:0.02),Q波心肌梗死(1.7%vs 5.9%,p:0.049),冠状动脉结合移植手术(2.6%vs 6.9%,p:0.002)和晚期支架内血栓形成(1.7%vs 3.9%,p:0.046)。结论:在未选择的土耳其人群中,在冠状动脉介入治疗的日常实践中,佐他莫司洗脱支架比紫杉醇洗脱支架具有更好的临床效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号