...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology >Application of Variance Component Analysis (ANOVA) in Setup Errors and PTV Margins for Lung Cancer with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
【24h】

Application of Variance Component Analysis (ANOVA) in Setup Errors and PTV Margins for Lung Cancer with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

机译:方差成分分析(ANOVA)在立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的肺癌设置误差和PTV裕度中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose : To investigate the feasibility of applying ANOVA newly proposed by Yukinori to verify the setup errors, PTV (Planning Target Volume) margins, DVH for lung cancer with SBRT. Methods : 20 patients receiving SBRT to 50 Gy in 5 fractions with a Varian iX linear acceleration were selected. Each patient was scanned with kV-CBCT before the daily treatment to verify the setup position. Two other error calculation methods raised by Van Herk and Remeijer were also compared to discover the statistical difference in systematic errors (Σ), random errors ( σ ), PTV margins and DVH. Results: Utilizing two PTV margin calculation formulas (Stroom, Van Herk), PTV calculated by Yukinori method in three directions were (5.89 and 3.95), (5.54 and 3.55), (3.24 and 0.78) mm; Van Herk method were (6.10 and 4.25), (5.73 and 3.83), (3.51 and 1.13) mm; Remeijer method were (6.39 and 4.57), (5.98 and 4.10), (3.69 and 1.33) mm. The volumes of PTV using Yukinori method were significantly smaller (P < 0.05) than Van Herk method and Remeijer method. However, dosimetric indices of PTV (D98, D50, D2) and for OARs (Mean Dose, V20, V5) had no significant difference (P > 0.05) among three methods. Conclusions : In lung SBRT treatment, due to fraction reduction and high level of dose per fraction, ANOVA was able to offset the effect of random factors in systematic errors, reducing the PTV margins and volumes. However, no distinct dose distribution improvement was founded in target volume and organs at risk.
机译:目的:研究用Yukinori新提出的ANOVA验证SBRT肺癌的设置误差,PTV(计划目标体积)余量,DVH的可行性。 方法:选择20例接受VRT iX线性加速度分5步接受SBRT至50 Gy的患者。在每日治疗之前,对每位患者进行kV-CBCT扫描,以验证设置位置。还比较了Van Herk和Remeijer提出的其他两种误差计算方法,以发现系统误差(Σ),随机误差(σ),PTV余量和DVH的统计差异。 结果:利用两种PTV裕度计算公式(Stroom,Van Herk),通过Yukinori方法计算出的PTV在三个方向上分别为(5.89和3.95),(5.54和3.55),(3.24和0.78)mm; Van Herk方法分别为(6.10和4.25),(5.73和3.83),(3.51和1.13)mm; Remeijer方法为(6.39和4.57),(5.98和4.10),(3.69和1.33)mm。使用Yukinori方法的PTV的体积明显小于Van Herk方法和Remeijer方法(P <0.05)。然而,三种方法中,PTV(D98,D50,D2)和OAR(平均剂量,V20,V5)的剂量指数没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。 结论:在肺SBRT治疗中,由于馏分减少和每馏分剂量较高,ANOVA能够抵消系统误差中随机因素的影响,从而减少PTV的余量和体积。但是,在目标体积和有风险的器官中,没有发现明显的剂量分布改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号