首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computers, communications and control >Digital Perception Functionality for Institutional Design: The Forest Policy Issue of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" of Scotland as a Case Study
【24h】

Digital Perception Functionality for Institutional Design: The Forest Policy Issue of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" of Scotland as a Case Study

机译:用于机构设计的数字感知功能:以苏格兰“洛蒙德湖与特罗萨克斯山国家公园”的森林政策问题为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Motivation for this research was the need to perceive the relations among?actors involved in the rural-forest policy networks. The problem of an objective analysis?of formal and informal power and information flow structure measurement and?visualization in policy-making is tried to be solved. The policy network of "Loch?Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" is used as a case study as it includes a great?variety of actors. An answer to the much-discussed problem of digital perception of?politico-administrative power are in part the results about: (1) how complexity of?policy making can be measured and what this practically means, (2) who controls?the communication, (3) where the most important information resources are located,?and (4) who is most trustworthy in this network. It is concluded that: "Important"?information is not a source of trust, but rather inversely, through trust one can impose?information as being important. Between actors of relatively high trust status, the?most trusted one does not need to control information in order to strengthen its position.?A less trusted actor may supplement the lack of power status with information?control. The leading role that forestry sector may play even in cross-sectoral issues is?pointed out in this case study.
机译:这项研究的动机是需要感知参与乡村森林政策网络的参与者之间的关系。试图解决客观分析正式和非正式权力与信息流结构的测量问题以及决策过程中的可视化问题。 “洛赫·罗蒙德与特罗萨克斯山国家公园”的政策网络被用作案例研究,因为它包含了众多参与者。对人们广泛讨论的对政治行政权力的数字感知问题的答案部分在于以下方面的结果:(1)如何衡量政策制定的复杂性,以及这实际上意味着什么,(2)谁控制着沟通? ,(3)最重要的信息资源位于何处,以及(4)在此网络中最值得信赖的人。结论是:“重要”信息不是信任的来源,而是相反,通过信任,人们可以将信息强加为重要信息。在信任状态相对较高的参与者之间,“最受信任的参与者”不需要控制信息以增强其地位。“信任度较低的参与者可以通过信息控制来补充权力状态的缺失。本案例研究指出了林业部门甚至在跨部门问题中可能发挥的主导作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号