...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Business and Management >A Critical Exploration of Collected Data in Business Research: Is Data Trustworthy? A Comparison of a Survey and Interviews
【24h】

A Critical Exploration of Collected Data in Business Research: Is Data Trustworthy? A Comparison of a Survey and Interviews

机译:商业研究中对收集数据的批判性探索:数据值得信赖吗?调查和访谈的比较

获取原文

摘要

Despite its crucial role within a research community, trustworthiness in data collecting has received surprisinglylittle scientific attention in research articles. Therefore, the overall purpose of this paper is to explore and discusstrustworthiness in collected data through both interview and questionnaire methods. The results of these methodsare reported as a methodological experiment. The answers from the questionnaires and the interviews werecompared and illustrated using a “Divergence Index,” which illustrates the coherence (trustworthiness) of the twodata-collection methods. The two data-collection methods tested in the study provided different results and hencepresent different factors of importance for SMEs. The present paper concludes that (1) there are few reflections onthe trustworthiness of collected data in prior research, and (2) the responses for two data collection methods showgreat divergence, which can have consequences on CEOs’ and other decision-makers decisions based on collecteddata.
机译:尽管在研究社区中起着至关重要的作用,但是数据收集中的可信度却在研究文章中受到了令人惊讶的小科学关注。因此,本文的总体目的是通过访谈和问卷调查的方法来探讨和讨论所收集数据的可信度。这些方法的结果报告为方法学实验。使用“散度指数”对问卷和访谈的答案进行了比较和说明,该指数说明了两种数据收集方法的一致性(可信度)。在研究中测试的两种数据收集方法提供了不同的结果,因此代表了对中小企业重要的不同因素。本文的结论是:(1)先前的研究对收集到的数据的可信度的思考很少,(2)两种数据收集方法的响应显示出很大的差异,这可能对首席执行官和其他基于决策者的决策产生影响收集的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号