首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Temperature superposition for fast computation of 3D temperature distributions during optimization and planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments
【24h】

Temperature superposition for fast computation of 3D temperature distributions during optimization and planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments

机译:温度叠加可在间质超声热疗的优化和计划过程中快速计算3D温度分布

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: A temperature superposition method has been developed for fast optimisation and planning of interstitial hyperthermia treatments with convectively cooled multi-transducer ultrasound applicators integrated within high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy catheters. Methods: Steady-state temperature distributions produced by individual tubular transducers capable of directional heating were pre-computed using finite element models (FEM) methods. The composite temperature distributions generated by multi-applicator implants were approximated as superposition sums of the pre-computed temperature profiles. Composite temperature distributions produced by the multi-applicator implants were also computed using accurate but computationally expensive FEM methods (considered here as the validation standard). Both methods were used for temperature calculation on a range of test implant geometries and representative patient cases (HDR implants in prostate (n?=?13) and cervix (n?=?2)), with optimised treatment plans created for the latter. Results: Difference between temperatures calculated by the superposition and FEM methods was below 0.37°C (95% confidence interval) in test implants at clinically relevant acoustic intensities (0.3–2.0?W/cmsup2/sup) and blood perfusion (2?kg/msup3/sup/s). Difference in 41°C isothermal volumes was below 8.3%. Superposition-based optimisations followed by FEM forward calculations (hybrid plans) were completed 4–7 times faster than FEM-only plans (FEM optimisation?+?FEM forward). Mean Tsub90/sub, Tsub50/sub and Tsub10/sub values from both plans were within 0.3°C, 0.4°C and 0.45°C respectively, and the mean acoustic intensities were within 0.23?W/cmsup2/sup. Conclusions: Temperature superposition provides a fast technique for forward or optimised planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments with calculations comparable to more accurate but time consuming FEM methods.
机译:目的:已经开发出一种温度叠加方法,用于通过整合在高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗导管中的对流冷却多换能器超声涂药器快速优化和计划间质热疗。方法:使用有限元模型(FEM)方法预先计算了能够定向加热的单个管状换能器产生的稳态温度分布。由多敷料器植入物产生的复合温度分布近似为预先计算的温度曲线的叠加总和。还使用精确但计算昂贵的有限元方法(此处被视为验证标准)来计算由多应用植入物产生的复合温度分布。两种方法均用于一系列测试植入物几何形状和代表性患者案例(前列腺(n≥13)和子宫颈(n≥2)的HDR植入物)的温度计算,并为后者创建了优化的治疗计划。结果:在临床相关的声强(0.3–2.0?W / cm 2 )和血液条件下,通过叠加法和FEM方法计算的温度之间的差异在测试植入物中低于0.37°C(95%置信区间)。灌注(2?kg / m 3 / s)。 41°C等温体积的差异低于8.3%。基于叠加的优化以及FEM正向计算(混合计划)的完成速度比仅FEM计划(FEM优化?+?FEM正向)的速度快4至7倍。两个计划的平均T 90 ,T 50 和T 10 值分别在0.3°C,0.4°C和0.45°C之内,并且平均声强在0.23?W / cm 2 范围内。结论:温度叠加为间质超声热疗的前瞻性或优化计划提供了一种快速技术,其计算结果可与更准确但耗时的FEM方法相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号