...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Image Processing >Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binarization Algorithms
【24h】

Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binarization Algorithms

机译:两种新的直方图限制二值化算法的定性和定量评估

获取原文

摘要

Image segmentation and thus feature extraction by binarization is a crucial aspect during image processing. The "most" critical criteria to improve further analysis on binary images is a least- biased comparison of different algorithms to identify the one performing best. Therefore, fast and easy-to-use evaluation methods are needed to compare different automatic intensity segmentation algorithms among each other. This is a difficult task due to variable image contents, different histogram shapes as well as specific user requirements regarding the extracted image features. Here, a new color-coding-based method is presented which facilitates semi-automatic qualitative as well as quantitative assessment of binarization methods relative to an intensity reference point. The proposed method represents a quick and reliable, quantitative measure for relative binarization quality assessment for individual images. Moreover, two new binarization algorithms based on statistical histogram values and initial histogram limitation are presented. This mode-limited mean (MoLiM) as well as the differential-limited mean (DiLiM) algorithms were implemented in ImageJ and compared to 22 existing global as well as local automatic binarization algorithms using the evaluation method described here. Results suggested that MoLiM quantitatively outperformed 11 and DiLiM 8 of the existing algorithms.
机译:图像分割以及因此通过二值化进行的特征提取是图像处理期间的关键方面。改善对二进制图像进一步分析的“最”关键标准是不同算法的最小偏差比较,以识别性能最佳的算法。因此,需要一种快速且易于使用的评估方法来相互比较不同的自动强度分割算法。由于可变的图像内容,不同的直方图形状以及有关提取的图像特征的特定用户要求,这是一项艰巨的任务。在这里,提出了一种新的基于颜色编码的方法,该方法有助于对强度参考点进行二值化方法的半自动定性和定量评估。所提出的方法代表了一种快速可靠的定量方法,用于对单个图像进行相对二值化质量评估。此外,提出了两种基于统计直方图值和初始直方图限制的新二值化算法。该模式限制均值(MoLiM)以及差分限制均值(DiLiM)算法在ImageJ中实现,并使用此处介绍的评估方法与22种现有的全局以及局部自动二值化算法进行了比较。结果表明,MoLiM在数量上优于现有算法的11和DiLiM 8。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号