首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Health Professions >Access to Psychotherapy in the Era of Web 2.0 – New Media, Old Inequalities? / Zugang zur Psychotherapie in der ?ra des Web 2.0 – Neue Medien, Alte Ungleichheiten?
【24h】

Access to Psychotherapy in the Era of Web 2.0 – New Media, Old Inequalities? / Zugang zur Psychotherapie in der ?ra des Web 2.0 – Neue Medien, Alte Ungleichheiten?

机译:Web 2.0时代获得心理治疗的途径-新媒体,旧的不平等? /在Web 2.0时代获得心理治疗-新媒体,旧的不平等?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Currently, the debate on regional and socio-structurally related treatment gaps in psychotherapeutic care increases the interest in e-mental health interventions such as the Internet-based psychotherapy, online self-help and new approaches for self-empowerment. Thus, health professionals could support informed decision-making by knowing the latest developments. However, if the ‘digital revolution’ fails to reach patients not familiar with Web 2.0, access to psychotherapies is unlikely to improve. Therefore, the objective of this review is to clarify whether online therapies should be recommended as an effective alternative to conventional psychotherapy in primary care.Methods: To investigate the research evidence of online therapies in adults within the last decade (2004-2014), a rapid review of literature was conducted by using electronic databases (i.e. Medline/PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library) to find systematic reviews, meta-analysis and clinical trials. Furthermore, a hand search in journals and grey literature was undertaken.Results: A search in PubMed for clinical trials on ‘online psychotherapy’ resulted in a total number of 245 publications. So, eight reviews and several clinical trials were chosen. Overall, mostly positive findings on the effectiveness and acceptance of online psychotherapy, primarily in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders, were identified.Discussion: In sum, Internet-based psychotherapies have been effective in reducing symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders in clinical trials. However, due to the limited range of treatable disorders and non-representative samples (young female college graduates), external validity remains insufficient. Thus, further research is needed to determine if online therapies will be capable of improving access to psychotherapy.
机译:背景:目前,关于心理治疗中与地区和社会结构有关的治疗差距的辩论增加了人们对电子心理健康干预措施的兴趣,这些干预措施包括基于互联网的心理治疗,在线自助和自我授权的新方法。因此,卫生专业人员可以通过了解最新动态来支持明智的决策。但是,如果“数字革命”未能覆盖不熟悉Web 2.0的患者,则心理治疗的机会就不会改善。因此,本综述的目的是弄清是否应推荐在线治疗作为初级保健中传统心理治疗的有效替代方法。方法:调查过去十年(2004-2014年)成人在线治疗的研究证据,通过使用电子数据库(即Medline / PubMed,PubMed Central,Cochrane图书馆)进行文献的快速综述,以找到系统的综述,荟萃分析和临床试验。此外,还对期刊和灰色文献进行了手工搜索。结果:在PubMed中搜索了有关“在线心理治疗”的临床试验,总共出版了245种出版物。因此,选择了八篇评论和几项临床试验。总的来说,主要是在抑郁症和焦虑症的治疗中,在线心理治疗的有效性和接受度方面获得了大部分积极的发现。讨论:总而言之,基于互联网的心理治疗在临床试验中已有效减轻了情绪和焦虑症的症状。但是,由于可治疗的疾病和非代表性样本(年轻女大学生)的范围有限,外部有效性仍然不足。因此,需要进一步研究以确定在线疗法是否能够改善获得心理疗法的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号