...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair? versus HandiHaler? in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial
【24h】

Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair? versus HandiHaler? in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial

机译:通过Discair ?与HandiHaler ?每天吸入18μg噻托溴铵对患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成年人的疗效:随机,主动控制,平行组,开放式标签,第四阶段试验

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To compare the bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation administered via Discair? versus HandiHaler? in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients and methods: Fifty-eight patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were enrolled in this randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a test group (n=29, inhalation with Discair) or a reference group (n=29, inhalation with HandiHaler). The primary efficacy parameter was the average maximum change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, in L). Change in forced vital capacity (FVC, in L), %FEV1 and %FVC, the standardized area under the response–time curve (AUC) for the absolute change in FEV1 and FVC, time to onset and peak of response, and safety data were also evaluated. Results: The test inhaler was non-inferior to the reference inhaler in terms of maximum change in FEV1 at 24 h (unadjusted change: 0.0017 L [95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.0777, 0.0812]; change adjusted for time to reach maximum change in FEV1 and smoking in pack-years: 0.0116 L [95% CI: –0.0699, 0.0931]), based on a non-inferiority margin of 0.100 L. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in maximum change in FVC value from baseline (0.3417 L vs 0.4438 L, P =0.113), percent change from baseline (22.235 vs 20.783 for FEV1, P =0.662; 16.719 vs 20.337 for FVC, P =0.257), and AUC0–24 h (2.949 vs 2.833 L for FEV1, P =0.891; 2.897 vs 4.729 L for FVC, P =0.178). There were no adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths. Conclusion: Our findings show that the Discair was non-inferior to the HandiHaler. More specifically, these devices had similar clinical efficacy in terms of time-dependent response over 24 h for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.
机译:目的:比较经Discair ?和HandiHaler ?每天服用18μg噻托溴铵吸入对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的支气管扩张剂疗效)。患者和方法:58例中度至重度COPD患者参加了这项随机,有效对​​照,平行组,开放标签,IV期非劣效性试验。将患者随机分为测试组(n = 29,用Discair吸入)或参考组(n = 29,HandiHaler吸入)。主要功效参数是强迫呼吸量在1秒内的平均最大变化(FEV 1 ,以L为单位)。强制肺活量(FVC,以L为单位),%FEV 1 和%FVC(FEV 1绝对变化的响应时间曲线(AUC)下的标准面积)的变化还评估了FVC,起效时间和反应高峰以及安全性数据。结果:就24小时FEV 1 的最大变化而言,测试吸入器不逊于参考吸入器(未经调整的变化:0.0017 L [95%置信区间[CI]:–0.0777,0.0812) ];根据到达时间(FEV 1 )和吸烟的最大变化进行了调整,每包年:0.0116 L [95%CI:–0.0699,0.0931],基于非劣质性余量0.100 L. FEV 1 的FVC值相对于基线的最大变化(0.3417 L vs.0.4438 L,P = 0.113),相对于基线的百分比变化(22.235 vs.20.783)之间也没有显着差异,P = 0.662; FVC为16.719 vs 20.337,P = 0.257)和AUC 0-24h (FEV 1 为2.249 vs 2.833 L,P = 0.891; 2.897 vs FVC的4.729 L,P = 0.178)。没有不良事件,严重不良事件或死亡。结论:我们的发现表明Discair不亚于HandiHaler。更具体地说,就中重度COPD患者而言,这些设备在24小时内的时间依赖性反应方面具有相似的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号