首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of General Medicine >Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib and naproxen versus placebo in Hispanic patients with knee osteoarthritis
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib and naproxen versus placebo in Hispanic patients with knee osteoarthritis

机译:塞来昔布和萘普生与安慰剂在西班牙裔膝骨关节炎患者中的疗效和耐受性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Celecoxib is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). However, information on its efficacy and safety profile in different racial/ethnic groups is limited. Noticeable differences among racial groups are found in other disease states, but a thorough investigation of OA is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine if celecoxib 200 mg once daily is as effective as naproxen 500 mg twice daily in the treatment of OA of the knee in Hispanic patients. Methods: Hispanic patients aged ≥45 years with knee OA were randomized to receive celecoxib 200 mg once daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in Patient’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain at 6 weeks compared with baseline. Secondary variables were change in Patient’s and Physician’s Global Assessments of Arthritis from baseline to week 6/early termination, change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) from baseline to week 6/early termination, change in American Pain Society pain score, Pain Satisfaction Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and measurements of upper gastrointestinal tolerability. Results: In total, 239 patients completed the trial (96 celecoxib, 96 naproxen, 47 placebo). Celecoxib was as effective as naproxen in reducing OA pain (least squares mean change from baseline [standard error] –39.7 [2.7] for celecoxib and –36.9 [2.6] for naproxen). Patient’s and Physician’s Global Assessments of Arthritis, WOMAC scores, upper gastrointestinal tolerability, Pain Satisfaction Scale, and PHQ-9 showed no statistically significant differences between the celecoxib and naproxen groups. The incidence of adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were similar among the treatment groups. Conclusion: Celecoxib 200 mg once daily was as effective as naproxen 500 mg twice daily in the treatment of signs and symptoms of knee OA in Hispanic patients. Celecoxib was shown to be safe and well tolerated in this patient population.
机译:背景:塞来昔布是治疗骨关节炎(OA)的有效方法。但是,有关其在不同种族/族裔群体中的功效和安全性的信息有限。在其他疾病状态下,种族群体之间也存在明显差异,但缺乏对OA的详尽调查。这项研究的目的是确定在西班牙裔患者的膝盖OA治疗中,每天一次200毫克的塞来昔布是否与每天两次500毫克的萘普生一样有效。方法:年龄≥45岁且膝OA的西班牙裔患者被随机分配接受塞来昔布200 mg每天一次,萘普生500 mg每天两次或安慰剂6周。主要功效变量是与基线相比,第6周患者对关节炎疼痛的评估的变化。次要变量包括从基线到第6周/早期终止的患者和医师的全球关节炎评估,从基线到第6周/早期终止的西安大略和麦克马斯特大学OA指数(WOMAC)的变化,美国疼痛学会疼痛评分的变化,疼痛满意度量表,患者健康调查表(PH​​Q-9)和上消化道耐受性的测量。结果:总共239名患者完成了试验(96塞来昔布,96萘普生,47安慰剂)。塞来昔布在减轻OA疼痛方面与萘普生一样有效(最小平方均值相对于基线水平的变化[标准误]塞来昔布为–39.7 [2.7],萘普生为–36.9 [2.6])。患者和医师的关节炎全球评估,WOMAC评分,上消化道耐受性,疼痛满意度量表和PHQ-9在塞来昔布和萘普生组之间没有统计学上的显着差异。治疗组之间不良事件和与治疗相关的不良事件的发生率相似。结论:塞来昔布200 mg每天一次与萘普生500 mg每天两次在治疗西班牙裔患者膝骨关节炎的体征和症状方面有效。塞来昔布在该患者人群中显示出安全性和耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号