首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Development and Application of a New Grey Dynamic Hierarchy Analysis System (GDHAS) for Evaluating Urban Ecological Security
【24h】

Development and Application of a New Grey Dynamic Hierarchy Analysis System (GDHAS) for Evaluating Urban Ecological Security

机译:评价城市生态安全的新型灰色动态层次分析系统(GDHAS)的开发与应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Selecting indicators based on the characteristics and development trends of a given study area is essential for building a framework for assessing urban ecological security. However, few studies have focused on how to select the representative indicators systematically, and quantitative research is lacking. We developed an innovative quantitative modeling approach called the grey dynamic hierarchy analytic system (GDHAS) for both the procedures of indicator selection and quantitative assessment of urban ecological security. Next, a systematic methodology based on the GDHAS is developed to assess urban ecological security comprehensively and dynamically. This assessment includes indicator selection, driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework building, and quantitative evaluation. We applied this systematic methodology to assess the urban ecological security of Tianjin, which is a typical coastal super megalopolis and the industry base in China. This case study highlights the key features of our approach. First, 39 representative indicators are selected for the evaluation index system from 62 alternative ones available through the GDHAS. Second, the DPSIR framework is established based on the indicators selected, and the quantitative assessment of the eco-security of Tianjin is conducted. The results illustrate the following: urban ecological security of Tianjin in 2008 was in alert level but not very stable; the driving force and pressure subsystems were in good condition, but the eco-security levels of the remainder of the subsystems were relatively low; the pressure subsystem was the key to urban ecological security; and 10 indicators are defined as the key indicators for five subsystems. These results can be used as the basis for urban eco-environmental management.
机译:根据给定研究区域的特征和发展趋势选择指标对于建立评估城市生态安全的框架至关重要。然而,很少有研究集中在如何系统地选择代表性指标上,并且缺乏定量研究。我们开发了一种创新的定量建模方法,称为灰色动态层次分析系统(GDHAS),用于指标选择和城市生态安全定量评估的程序。接下来,开发了一种基于GDHAS的系统方法来全面,动态地评估城市生态安全。该评估包括指标选择,驱动力-压力-状态-冲击-响应(DPSIR)框架构建和定量评估。我们运用这种系统的方法来评估天津的城市生态安全,天津是典型的沿海超级大城市和中国的工业基地。本案例研究突出了我们方法的关键特征。首先,从GDHAS提供的62个替代指标中选择39个代表性指标用于评估指标体系。其次,基于所选指标建立DPSIR框架,并对天津市的生态安全进行定量评估。结果表明:2008年天津市城市生态安全水平处于警戒水平,但不稳定。驱动力和压力子系统状况良好,但其余子系统的生态安全水平相对较低;压力子系统是城市生态安全的关键。 10个指标被定义为五个子系统的关键指标。这些结果可作为城市生态环境管理的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号