首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Electrochemical Science >Improvement of Voltammetric Detection of Sulfanilamide with a Nanodiamond?Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode
【24h】

Improvement of Voltammetric Detection of Sulfanilamide with a Nanodiamond?Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode

机译:纳米金刚石修饰玻碳电极伏安法检测磺胺类药物的改进

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Owing to its high hardness, high chemical inertness, and good biocompatibility, nanodiamond (ND) hasrecently been increasingly used in electrochemical analysis. In this work, a comparative study ofvoltammetric detection of sulfanilamide using a bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and ND-modifiedglassy carbon electrode (GCE?ND) was carried out. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) analyses revealed that modification of a GCE with 100 μL of ND suspension (40mg·L ?1 ) was the optimum condition in this study. The results of CV analyses with the [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3? redoxcouple suggested the occurrence of a diffusion-controlled process on both electrodes. However, theGCE?ND exhibited a larger electroactive surface area and a higher heterogeneous electron transfer rateconstant, which were approximately 2.11 and 5.05 times greater than those of the bare GCE, respectively.When applied to the detection of sulfanilamide solution using square wave voltammetry under theoptimum conditions, the bare GCE showed a linear dynamic range of 1?80 mg·L ?1 (R 2 = 0.9994) witha detection limit of 0.744 mg·L ?1 , by contrast, the GCE?ND showed a linear dynamic range of 0.2?100mg·L ?1 (R 2 = 0.9949) with a detection limit of 0.161 mg·L ?1 . The detection limit of the GCE?ND wasas much as 78.4% lower than that of the bare GCE. Furthermore, interday detection experiments revealedthat the GCE?ND had higher repeatability and accuracy than the bare GCE.
机译:由于其高硬度,高化学惰性和良好的生物相容性,纳米金刚石(ND)最近已越来越多地用于电化学分析中。在这项工作中,进行了使用裸玻璃碳电极(GCE)和ND改性玻璃碳电极(GCE→ND)伏安法检测磺胺的比较研究。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和循环伏安法(CV)分析表明,用100μLND悬浮液(40mg·L?1)修饰GCE是本研究的最佳条件。用[Fe(CN)6] 3进行CV分析的结果。氧化还原对表明在两个电极上都发生了扩散控制过程。然而,GCE?ND的电活性表面积和非均质电子传递速率常数分别比裸露的GCE大约2.11倍和5.05倍。当在最佳条件下使用方波伏安法检测磺胺溶液时在条件下,裸露的GCE的线性动态范围为0.28 mg·L?1(R 2 = 0.9994),检出限为0.744 mg·L?1,而GCE ND的线性动态范围为0.2。 ≤100mg·L≤1(R 2 = 0.9949),检出限为0.161mg·L≤1。 GCE?ND的检出限比裸GCE的检出限低78.4%。此外,日间检测实验表明,GCE?ND比裸露的GCE具有更高的重复性和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号