首页> 外文期刊>International journal of construction education and research >Perceptions of Scholarly Standards in Technical Publication
【24h】

Perceptions of Scholarly Standards in Technical Publication

机译:对技术出版物中学术标准的看法

获取原文
       

摘要

In fall of 2007, a survey was administered to the membership of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) to evaluate member perspectives on scholarly standards as they relate to the International Journal of Construction Education and Research (“Journal”). The objectives of this study were to 1) survey respondent understanding of Journal aims and scope, 2) assess respondent interpretations of scholarly work, and 3) survey respondent attitudes on the overall effectiveness of the Journal submission and peer-review process. Of 106 respondents, 74% had previously published or reviewed for the Journal. While 65% of respondents indicated that the aim of the Journal was to publish scholarly works in both construction education and research, respondents were near equally divided on whether non-original research constitutes scholarly work. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Journal topics (87%), title (93%), and assessment criteria (83%) were appropriate. Ninety-four percent of peer reviewers felt the J...
机译:在2007年秋天,对建筑工程联合会(ASC)的成员进行了一项调查,以评估成员对与《国际建筑教育与研究杂志》(“ Journal”)相关的学术标准的看法。这项研究的目的是:1)调查受访者对期刊目的和范围的理解; 2)评估受访者对学术工作的理解; 3)调查受访者对期刊投稿和同行评审过程总体有效性的态度。在106位受访者中,有74%以前曾为《华尔街日报》发表过或进行过评论。尽管65%的受访者表示《华尔街日报》的目的是在建筑教育和研究领域发表学术著作,但在非原创性研究是否构成学术著作方面,受访者几乎持平。受访者同意或强烈同意期刊主题(87%),标题(93%)和评估标准(83%)是适当的。百分之九十四的同行评审认为...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号