首页> 外文期刊>International journal of ecology & enviromental sciences >Assessment of Biomass, Carbon stock and Carbon Sequestration Potential of Two Major Land Uses of Mizoram, India
【24h】

Assessment of Biomass, Carbon stock and Carbon Sequestration Potential of Two Major Land Uses of Mizoram, India

机译:印度米佐拉姆邦两种主要土地利用方式的生物量,碳储量和碳固存潜力评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Assessment of biomass, carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential have never been carried out in major land uses of Mizoram. We aimed at comparin g the carbon sequestration potential of two major land uses (Shi?ing agriculture and homegardens) involving 32 sites drawn from different size and age groups so as to understand their role in carbon sink and mitigation process. Biomass in homegardens (HGS) ranged fro111 1 16.8 to 278.5 Mg ha" and 60.0 to 95.2 Mg ha" in shifting cultivation fallows (SCFs) while the biomass carbon in HGS and SCFS ranged from 59.0 to 140.0 Mg C ha" and 31.6 to 49.1 Mg C ha“, respectively. Among the homegardens, the older HGS stored higher biomass than the yoimger ones while reverse was true for the SCFs. Carbon stock in HGS (291.0 :1: 15.4 Mg C ha") was higher than in the SCFs (164.1 :1: 8.6 Mg C ha"). Carbon stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC) and living biomass components were signi?cantly (p<0.05) higher in HGs than SCFs, while carbon stock of 11011-living biomass in SCFs was higher than that of HGS. In both HGS and SCFS, a positive increment of living biomass C was observed while the non- living biomass C decreased. Small HGs signi?cantly (p<0.05) sequester more carbon than the medium and large sized homegardens. The rate of CO2 mitigation potential in HGS and SCFS exhibited range of 4.86 to 22.89 and 2.67 to 12.29 Mg ha" yr", respectively.
机译:在米佐拉姆邦的主要土地用途中,从未进行过生物量,碳储量和碳固存潜力的评估。我们的目的是比较两个主要土地用途(Shining农业和家庭园艺)的碳固存潜力,其中涉及来自不同规模和年龄组的32个地点,以了解它们在碳汇和减缓过程中的作用。轮作休耕(SCF)中,家庭花园(HGS)的生物量为111的16.8至278.5 Mg ha“和60.0至95.2 Mg ha”,而HGS和SCFS中的生物质碳的范围为59.0至140.0 Mg C ha“和31.6至49.1在家庭花园中,较老的HGS的生物量要比yoimger的高,而SCF的生物量却相反。HGS中的碳储量(291.0:1:15.4 Mg C ha“)高于SCF。 (164.1:1:8.6 Mg C ha“)。HG中土壤有机碳(SOC)和活生物量组分的碳储量比SCF高(p <0.05),而SCF中11011活生物量的碳储量HGS和SCFS均观察到活生物量C的正增加,而非活生物量C的减少,小HG的固碳量(p <0.05)比中型和大型的高。 HGS和SCFS的CO2减排潜力速率范围为4.86至22.89和2.67至12.29 Mg ha•yr “, 分别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号