首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Incidence and management of post-dural puncture headache following spinal anaesthesia and accidental dural puncture from a non-obstetric hospital: A retrospective analysis
【24h】

Incidence and management of post-dural puncture headache following spinal anaesthesia and accidental dural puncture from a non-obstetric hospital: A retrospective analysis

机译:非产科医院脊柱麻醉后硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的发生率及处理:回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the complications following spinal anaesthesia (SA) and accidental dural puncture (ADP). In our institute, we routinely practice epidural analgesia (EA) for supra-major surgeries. Our previous audit on EA revealed 4% incidence of ADP. This lead us to a clinical initiative to follow-up patients with dural puncture (DP) to note the incidence, presentation, associated symptoms and treatment of PDPH. Herewith, we present the retrospective analysis over a 2-year period. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, the follow-up notes of patients who had DP from May 2011 to April 2013 were analysed retrospectively (using SPSS 20 version) with respect to the needle size, level of DP, reinsertion of epidural catheter, details of ongoing analgesics, incidence and severity of PDPH and treatment received. Results: In 2 years, we found that the incidence of PDPH in the patients who received SA was 3.9% and 25% in the ADP group. There was a positive association between needle size, type and PDPH, and it was seen more in the 20–40 age group. The commonest presentation of PDPH was occipital/frontal headache within 96 h and lasted for a mean of 3 days. All patients received pharmacological treatment. Seventy-one per cent of patients (25) were either on coffee or caffeine tablets. One case of intractable PDPH responded well to oral pregabalin 75 mg. Conclusion: PDPH severity and incidence following ADP in our centre is lower than the reported incidence from obstetric centres and can be effectively controlled with drug treatment only.
机译:背景与目的:硬脑膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是脊柱麻醉(SA)和意外硬膜穿刺(ADP)后的并发症之一。在我们的研究所,我们常规地对大手术进行硬膜外镇痛(EA)。我们之前对EA进行的审核显示,ADP的发生率为4%。这导致我们采取一项临床计划,对硬脑膜穿刺(DP)的患者进行随访,以记录PDPH的发生率,表现,相关症状和治疗。因此,我们提出了为期2年的回顾性分析。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,对2011年5月至2013年4月患有DP的患者的随访记录进行回顾性分析(使用SPSS 20版本),包括针头大小,DP水平,硬膜外导管插入,详细信息。正在进行的镇痛药,PDPH的发生率和严重程度以及所接受的治疗。结果:在2年中,我们发现接受SA的患者中PDPH的发生率分别为ADP组的3.9%和25%。针头大小,类型和PDPH之间存在正相关,在20-40岁年龄组中观察到更多。 PDPH的最常见表现是在96小时内枕部/额部头痛,平均持续3天。所有患者均接受药物治疗。 71%(25)的患者喝咖啡或咖啡因片剂。一例顽固性PDPH对口服普瑞巴林75 mg反应良好。结论:我们中心ADP术后PDPH的严重性和发生率低于产科中心报道的发生率,仅通过药物治疗即可有效控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号