...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology >Happy Days: Positive Psychology interventions effects on affect in an N-of-1 trial
【24h】

Happy Days: Positive Psychology interventions effects on affect in an N-of-1 trial

机译:欢乐时光:积极的心理学干预措施在N项1项试验中对情感的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) have been suggested as self-help tools to increase subjective well-being and happiness. However, most previous studies have been based on between-group comparisons, which are not informative with regard to trajectories of individual change over time. This study is a first attempt at examining whether completing frequently used PPIs — ‘Three Good Things in Life’, ‘Using Signature Strengths in a New Way’ and ‘Gratitude Visit’ —results in consistent changes in affect at the level of the individual. In an N-of-1-study design, participants were randomly allocated to one of six counterbalanced patterns of the PPIs over a 9–10 week period. The affective aspect of subjective well-being was measured daily using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). Hierarchical linear modelling showed significant changes in PANAS scores, but no statistically significant differential impact on positive affect of the PPIs, apart from a marginally significant time×intervention interaction for ‘Using Signature Strengths in a New Way’. This suggests that frequently used PPIs do not result in changes in affect over time. This finding questions recommending the use of PPIs as self-help tools.
机译:积极心理学干预(PPI)已被建议作为自助工具来增加主观幸福感和幸福感。但是,大多数以前的研究都是基于组间比较的,这对于随着时间的推移而发生的个人变化轨迹没有多大意义。这项研究是首次尝试检查完成经常使用的PPI(“生活中的三件好事”,“以新方式使用签名优势”和“感恩来访”)是否会导致个人水平上的影响不断变化。在N个研究的1个设计中,参与者在9-10周内被随机分配到PPI的6种平衡模式之一。每天使用正面和负面影响量表(PANAS)来测量主观幸福感的情感方面。分层线性建模显示PANAS分数有显着变化,但对PPI的积极影响没有统计学上的显着差异,除了“以新方式使用签名优势”的时间x干预交互作用微乎其微。这表明,经常使用的PPI不会导致影响随时间变化。该发现存在一些问题,建议使用PPI作为自助工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号