Audit of prescriptions from the department of general medicine based on the WHO core prescribing indicators at Sapthagiri hospital, Bangalore

摘要

Background: As medical students start their clinical training, more effort goes in the direction of proper diagnosis and appropriate methods of treatment, leading to improper training in prescription writing causing prescription errors. Physicians should also be encouraged to prescribe unbranded generic medicines which are available at a cheaper price with a comparable bioavailability of drugs and not have a misconception of being less efficacious. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out over a period of 2 months (September to October 2018). Around 256 prescriptions were randomly collected from general medicine out-patient department. Informed consent was obtained verbally, and confidentiality assured. The collected data was analyzed as per descriptive statistics and compared with the derived standard values for WHO prescribing indicators. Results: The analyzed data showed an average of 2.23±1.03 drugs per prescription. 23% of the prescriptions had at least one drug prescribed by generic name, 25% of prescriptions contained an antibiotic and 31% of prescriptions had an injection. The percentage of drugs prescribed from NLEM (National list of Essential Medicines) was only 57% as compared to the recommended 100%. Additional only 22.4% of the total number of FDCs prescribed were from NLEM. Conclusions: The average number of drugs per prescription was slightly high, indicating polypharmacy. Brand name prescribing dominates as doctors are still reluctant to use generic names being doubtful of the efficacy. Regular prescription audit with reporting might help to bring awareness among doctors to follow the recommended guidelines and minimize prescription errors.