首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation >Wildlife crop damage valuation and conservation: conflicting perception by local farmers in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia
【24h】

Wildlife crop damage valuation and conservation: conflicting perception by local farmers in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia

机译:野生生物作物危害的评估和保护:赞比亚东部卢安瓜谷当地农民的看法相悖

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Wildlife conservation in Luangwa Valley depends on perception by local communities, and is affected by wildlife crop raiding. Perception of local farmers were elucidated between 2006/7 and 2008/9 farming seasons. Data collection was done using prescribed forms and semi-structured questionnaires by trained field assistants. The case study findings confirm that firstly, perceived and actual crop losses differed by 49.49 and 7.78% for?mono-specific stands of?maize and cotton, respectively. Secondly, opportunity costs incurred and perceived by local farmers were higher than direct costs. Most farmers (79.83%, n = 95) associated opportunity costs of wildlife crop damage with loss of sleep and loss of time for other chores, when providing crop protection. Thirdly, conservation objectives and local farmers’ needs and aspirations were antithetical. Majority of local farmers (82.59%, n = 204) expanded or segregated crop fields, thereby degrading wildlife habitats. Ensuing negative perception posed high risks to wildlife conservation in Luangwa Valley. Incentivising performance conservation payments to local farmers are recommended, to increase their tolerance levels while incurring costs of living with wildlife. Implementation of improved environmental education and awareness creation, coupled with capacity building through appropriate trainings and facilitated infrastructure in resolving human-wildlife conflicts are critical.
机译:卢安瓜谷的野生动物保护取决于当地社区的认识,并受到野生动植物袭击的影响。在2006/7到2008/9种植季节之间阐明了对当地农民的看法。数据收集是由经过训练的现场助理使用规定的表格和半结构化问卷完成的。案例研究结果证实,首先,玉米和棉花单种林分的感知损失和实际损失分别为49.49%和7.78%。其次,当地农民引起的机会成本高于直接成本。在提供作物保护时,大多数农民(79.83%,n = 95)将野生动植物作物受损的机会成本与睡眠时间和其他琐事的时间损失相关联。第三,保护目标与当地农民的需求和愿望是对立的。大多数当地农民(82.59%,n = 204)扩大或隔离了耕地,从而破坏了野生动植物的栖息地。随之而来的负面看法给卢安瓜谷野生动植物保护带来高风险。建议增加奖励给当地农民的绩效保育金,以增加他们的忍耐水平,同时增加野生动物的生活成本。实施改善的环境教育和意识建设,以及通过适当的培训和便利的基础设施解决人类与野生动物冲突的能力建设至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号