...
首页> 外文期刊>International heart journal >Outcomes in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia due to Arteriosclerosis Obliterans Who Did Not Undergo Arterial Reconstruction
【24h】

Outcomes in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia due to Arteriosclerosis Obliterans Who Did Not Undergo Arterial Reconstruction

机译:未进行动脉重建的闭塞性动脉硬化闭塞性严重肢体缺血患者的预后

获取原文

摘要

p class="global-para-14" pThe prevalence of arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) is currently increasing, and arterial reconstruction is often attempted to salvage the limb. Some patients cannot undergo attempted revascularization because of contraindications, and they only receive conservative treatment. In this study, we investigate the comorbidities and survival rates of patients with CLI who receive conservative treatment. Thirty-five patients with CLI due to ASO, who had not undergone revascularization surgery (C group), were enrolled. As controls, 136 patients with CLI due to ASO who did undergo revascularization (R group), mainly via bypass surgery, were enrolled. Coronary artery disease, heart failure, and respiratory dysfunction were factors indicating conservative treatment. Limb salvage rates and survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients who had survived for less than two years after surgery had a higher prevalence of chronic heart failure, cardiovascular disease, and end-stage renal disease compared to patients who had survived for more than two years. The use of statins, dual antiplatelets, aspirin, or warfarin did not influence whether a patient survived for longer than two years. 77% of patients survived for more than two years after receiving only conservative therapies. Surgical revascularization did not improve the prognosis of patients with CLI as compared with the conservative therapy. Clinicians might start with conservative treatment while considering other treatment options for patients with CLI./p /p
机译:class =“ global-para-14”> >闭塞性动脉硬化症(ASO)和严重肢体缺血(CLI)的患病率目前正在上升,并且经常尝试通过动脉重建来挽救肢体。由于禁忌症,一些患者无法进行尝试的血运重建,他们仅接受保守治疗。在这项研究中,我们调查接受保守治疗的CLI患者的合并症和生存率。纳入了35例因ASO而未接受血管重建手术的CLI患者(C组)。作为对照,纳入了136例主要通过搭桥手术进行了血运重建的ASO所致CLI的患者(R组)。冠状动脉疾病,心力衰竭和呼吸功能不全是表明保守治疗的因素。两组的肢体抢救率和存活率无显着差异。与存活超过两年的患者相比,术后存活不到两年的患者患慢性心力衰竭,心血管疾病和终末期肾脏疾病的患病率更高。他汀类药物,双重抗血小板药,阿司匹林或华法林的使用不会影响患者是否存活超过两年。仅接受保守疗法后,有77%的患者存活超过两年。与保守疗法相比,外科血运重建不能改善CLI患者的预后。临床医生可能会从保守治疗开始,同时考虑CLI患者的其他治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号