首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >A study on antimicrobial agents utilization pattern using anatomical therapeutic chemical / daily defined dose system and adverse drug reaction pattern in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North Eastern state of India
【24h】

A study on antimicrobial agents utilization pattern using anatomical therapeutic chemical / daily defined dose system and adverse drug reaction pattern in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North Eastern state of India

机译:印度北部一所三级教学医院的重症监护室使用解剖化学治疗药物/每日定义剂量系统和药物不良反应模式研究抗菌药物利用模式的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Successful use of antibiotics has brought a revolutionary change in the management of infectious diseases but has also resulted in its irrational use. Indiscriminate use of anti-microbial agents (AMAs) has been well-documented in the ICUs where polypharmacy is a common phenomenon, thus increasing the risk of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). It is extremely imperative to evaluate the prescribing pattern of antimicrobials for enabling suitable modifications in prescribing patterns; to increase the therapeutic benefits and for optimizing the health care services. Methods: With the objective to assess the prescription patterns of AMAs and the rationality of their use this observational study was undertaken in the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital for two months. Results: Of the total 127 patients, 80 (62.99%) were male and 47 (37.01%) were female at an average age of 51.3±18.3 years. 102 (80.31%) patients received AMAs at average of 1.71±0.99 and 25 (19.69%) didn’t. Betalactam antibiotics were the most frequently (72.99 %) prescribed class. Meropenem was the most commonly prescribed (41 occasions) agent. The length of stay in ICU per patient was 4.42±3.49 days. 41.63% patients had more than two morbidities. No AMAs were prescribed in generic name. In 28 (27.45%) patients the AMAs prescribing were irrational. Conclusions: The high utilization rates of costly AMAs and irrational prescriptions are matters of great concern and need to be urgently addressed by use of guidelines, surveillance and antibiotic restriction policies and sensitization programs at all level of healthcare.
机译:背景:抗生素的成功使用带来了传染病管理方面的革命性变化,但也导致其不合理使用。在ICU中,滥用药物(AMA)的滥用已被广泛记录,在ICU中,多药是一种普遍现象,因此增加了药物不良反应(ADR)的风险。必须评估抗菌药物的处方模式,以便对处方模式进行适当的修改;增加治疗效果并优化医疗服务。方法:为了评估AMA的处方模式及其使用的合理性,本观察研究在三级医院的重症监护室进行了两个月。结果:127例患者中,男性80例(62.99%),女性47例(37.01%),平均年龄51.3±18.3岁。 102(80.31%)名患者平均接受了1.71±0.99的AMA,而25名(19.69%)未接受。内酰胺类抗生素是处方药中最常见的(72.99%)。美洛培南是最常用的处方药(41次)。每位患者在ICU的住院时间为4.42±3.49天。 41.63%的患者患有两种以上的疾病。没有以通用名称规定AMA。在28名(27.45%)患者中,AMA处方不合理。结论:昂贵的AMA的高利用率和不合理的处方是一个令人高度关注的问题,需要通过在所有医疗机构中使用指南,监测和抗生素限制政策以及敏化计划来紧急解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号