首页> 外文期刊>International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences >CAN AN INEXPENSIVE PHONE APP COMPARE TO OTHER METHODS WHEN IT COMES TO 3D DIGITIZATION OF SHIP MODELS
【24h】

CAN AN INEXPENSIVE PHONE APP COMPARE TO OTHER METHODS WHEN IT COMES TO 3D DIGITIZATION OF SHIP MODELS

机译:低价位电话应用程序可以在船舶模型的3D数字化时与其他方法进行比较吗

获取原文
       

摘要

This study compares the differences between traditional 3D modeling software such as ‘Agisoft Metashape’ and the recently released smartphone application ‘Qlone’. Specifically, this study examines how well each software handles creating 3D renderings of ship models. Comparisons between quality, complexity handling, time, cost, and equipment requirements will be examined to better understand each program's strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, Agisoft Metashape will demonstrate that it is still the preferred method for most professional and academic use for its high precision accuracy. While Qlone may be a reasonable choice for the average hobbyist or enthusiast due to its availability and relatively low cost.
机译:这项研究比较了传统3D建模软件(如“ Agisoft Metashape”)与最近发布的智能手机应用程序“ Qlone”之间的区别。具体而言,本研究研究了每种软件处理船舶模型的3D渲染的效果如何。将检查质量,复杂性处理,时间,成本和设备要求之间的比较,以更好地了解每个程序的优缺点。最终,Agisoft Metashape将证明它仍然具有较高的精度,仍然是大多数专业和学术用途的首选方法。尽管Qlone由于其可用性和相对较低的价格,对于普通的业余爱好者或发烧友来说可能是一个合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号