首页> 外文期刊>Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology >“Men don’t cry”: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Black South African Men’s Experience of Divorce
【24h】

“Men don’t cry”: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Black South African Men’s Experience of Divorce

机译:“男人别哭”:南非黑人男子离婚经历的解释现象学分析

获取原文
       

摘要

The decision to divorce marks a turning point for every individual involved. It can be viewed as more than just a legal process. From a psychological perspective, it does not matter who initiated the divorce, since it always comes with emotional ramifications for all those involved. Statistically, there is a high rate of divorce in South Africa and there have been significant shifts in trends over time. While black South African men’s experience of divorce has been relatively neglected in the research on divorce, it is important for understanding contemporary social arrangements and processes, and, in particular, for broadening the understanding of black South African men’s lives. How black South African men describe their experience and respond to marital dissolution may point to their positions in the gender-structured community as well as illuminate how they interpret the nature of social practice, marriage, divorce and their position in society. The aim of the research reported on in this paper was to explore black South African men’s experience of divorce. The theoretical framework underpinning this qualitative study was broadly that of Symbolic Interactionism, with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) employed as both the research design and data analytic theory and process. The eight participants were volunteers who were recruited purposively. In keeping with IPA guidelines, data-collection proceeded by means of biographical questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The emerging themes were grouped into three superordinate themes, namely, perceptions of divorce, social support, and experiencing of pain. Each superordinate theme had corresponding subordinate themes and experiential claims. Weed’s (2008) recommendations for the interpretative synthesis of interview data were applied.
机译:离婚的决定标志着每个参与者的转折点。可以将其视为不仅仅是法律程序。从心理学的角度来看,谁发起离婚并不重要,因为离婚总是伴随着所有参与者的情感分歧。从统计上看,南非的离婚率很高,而且随着时间的推移趋势也发生了重大变化。尽管南非黑人的离婚经历在离婚研究中相对被忽略了,但对于理解当代社会安排和过程,尤其是扩大对南非黑人生活的理解,这一点很重要。南非黑人如何描述自己的经历以及如何应对婚姻破裂,这可能表明他们在性别结构化社区中的地位,并阐明了他们如何解释社会实践,婚姻,离婚及其在社会中的地位的本质。本文报道的研究目的是探讨南非黑人男子的离婚经历。定性研究的理论框架广泛地是符号互动主义的框架,解释性现象学分析(IPA)被用作研究设计以及数据分析的理论和过程。八名参与者是有目的招募的志愿者。根据《近期行动计划》的指导原则,通过传记调查表和半结构式访谈进行数据收集。新兴主题被分为三个上级主题,即离婚感,社会支持和痛苦经历。每个上级主题都有相应的下级主题和经验要求。 Weed(2008)提出了关于访谈数据解释性综合的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号