首页> 外文期刊>International journal for equity in health >Impact of pharmaceutical policy interventions on utilization of antipsychotic medicines in Finland and Portugal in times of economic recession: interrupted time series analyses
【24h】

Impact of pharmaceutical policy interventions on utilization of antipsychotic medicines in Finland and Portugal in times of economic recession: interrupted time series analyses

机译:经济衰退时期药品政策干预措施对芬兰和葡萄牙抗精神病药物使用的影响:时间序列分析中断

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives To analyze the impacts of pharmaceutical sector policies implemented to contain country spending during the economic recession – a reference price system in Finland and a mix of policies including changes in reimbursement rates, a generic promotion campaign and discounts granted to the public payer in Portugal – on utilization of, as a proxy for access to, antipsychotic medicines. Methodology We obtained monthly IMS Health sales data in standard units of antipsychotic medicines in Portugal and Finland for the period January 2007 to December 2011. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate changes in overall use and generic market shares by comparing pre-policy and post-policy levels and trends. Results Both countries’ policy approaches were associated with slight, likely unintended, decreases in overall use of antipsychotic medicines and with increases in generic market shares of major antipsychotic products. In Finland, quetiapine and risperidone generic market shares increased substantially (estimates one year post-policy compared to before, quetiapine: 6.80% [3.92%, 9.68%]; risperidone: 11.13% [6.79%, 15.48%]. The policy interventions in Portugal resulted in a substantially increased generic market share for amisulpride (estimate one year post-policy compared to before: 22.95% [21.01%, 24.90%]; generic risperidone already dominated the market prior to the policy interventions. Conclusions Different policy approaches to contain pharmaceutical expenditures in times of the economic recession in Finland and Portugal had intended – increased use of generics – and likely unintended – slightly decreased overall sales, possibly consistent with decreased access to needed medicines – impacts. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and evaluating the effects of pharmaceutical policy interventions on use of medicines and health outcomes.
机译:目标为了分析在经济衰退期间为遏制国家支出而实施的制药部门政策的影响-芬兰的参考价格体系以及包括报销费率变化,通用促销活动和葡萄牙公共支付者折扣的政策组合-关于使用抗精神病药物的代理。方法论我们获得了葡萄牙和芬兰2007年1月至2011年12月期间抗精神病药标准单位的IMS Health每月销售数据。我们使用了间断时间序列设计,通过比较政策前法规和政策前法规来评估总体使用和仿制药市场份额的变化。后政策水平和趋势。结果两国的政策方针都与抗精神病药物的总体使用量略有减少(可能是意料之外的)以及主要抗精神病药物的仿制药市场份额增加有关。在芬兰,喹硫平和利培酮的非专利药市场份额大幅增加(估计政策实施一年后,喹硫平:6.80%[3.92%,9.68%];利培酮:11.13%[6.79%,15.48%]。葡萄牙导致氨磺必利的通用仿制药市场份额大大增加(与政策前相比,估计一年后:22.95%[21.01%,24.90%];通用利培酮已在政策干预之前主导了市场。结论不同的遏制政策途径在芬兰和葡萄牙的经济衰退时期,药品支出的原意是–增加了仿制药的使用–可能是意料之外的–总体销售略有下降,可能与所需药品的获取量减少有关–影响。药物政策干预措施对药物使用和健康结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号