...
首页> 外文期刊>Interactive Journal of Medical Research >Remote Monitoring for Implantable Defibrillators: A Nationwide Survey in Italy
【24h】

Remote Monitoring for Implantable Defibrillators: A Nationwide Survey in Italy

机译:植入式除颤器的远程监控:意大利的全国范围内的调查

获取原文

摘要

Background Remote monitoring (RM) permits home interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and provides an alternative option to frequent in-person visits. Objective The Italia-RM survey aimed to investigate the current practice of ICD follow-up in Italy and to evaluate the adoption and routine use of RM. Methods An ad hoc questionnaire on RM adoption and resource use during in-clinic and remote follow-up sessions was completed in 206 Italian implanting centers. Results The frequency of routine in-clinic ICD visits was 2 per year in 158/206 (76.7%) centers, 3 per year in 37/206 (18.0%) centers, and 4 per year in 10/206 (4.9%) centers. Follow-up examinations were performed by a cardiologist in 203/206 (98.5%) centers, and by more than one health care worker in 184/206 (89.3%) centers. There were 137/206 (66.5%) responding centers that had already adopted an RM system, the proportion of ICD patients remotely monitored being 15% for single- and dual-chamber ICD and 20% for cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD. Remote ICD interrogations were scheduled every 3 months, and were performed by a cardiologist in 124/137 (90.5%) centers. After the adoption of RM, the mean time between in-clinic visits increased from 5 (SD 1) to 8 (SD 3) months ( P <.001). Conclusions In current clinical practice, in-clinic ICD follow-up visits consume a large amount of health care resources. The results of this survey show that RM has only partially been adopted in Italy and, although many centers have begun to implement RM in their clinical practice, the majority of their patients continue to be routinely followed-up by means of in-clinic visits.
机译:背景技术远程监控(RM)允许对植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)进行家庭询问,并为经常亲自出诊提供了一种替代选择。目的意大利-RM调查旨在调查ICD后续活动在意大利的现行做法,并评估RM的采用和常规使用。方法在206个意大利植入中心中完成了关于在临床和远程随访过程中RM采用和资源使用的临时问卷。结果在158/206(76.7%)的中心,例行ICD的常规就诊频率为每年两次,在37/206(18.0%)的中心中,每年3次,在10/206(4.9%)的中心,每年4次。心脏科医师在203/206(98.5%)个中心进行了随访检查,并在184/206(89.3%)个中心进行了一名以上的卫生保健工作者的随访检查。已有137/206(66.5%)个响应中心已采用RM系统,远程监测的ICD患者中单腔和双腔ICD的比例为15%,心脏再同步治疗ICD的比例为20%。每3个月安排一次远程ICD询问,由心脏病专家在124/137(90.5%)的中心进行。通过RM后,两次就诊之间的平均时间从5(SD 1)个月增加到8(SD 3)个月(P <.001)。结论在当前的临床实践中,ICD的门诊随访消耗大量医疗保健资源。这项调查的结果表明,RM仅在意大利得到部分采用,尽管许多中心已开始在其临床实践中实施RM,但仍对大多数患者进行常规的门诊随访。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号