...
首页> 外文期刊>Interactive Journal of Medical Research >Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature
【24h】

Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature

机译:确定用于评估具有患者健康信息的YouTube视频质量的措施:最新文献回顾

获取原文

摘要

Background Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77%), (2) view count in 9/13 (69%), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62%), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46%), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39%), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39%), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31%), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31%), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31%), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31%), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31%), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23%), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15%). Conclusions Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.
机译:背景技术YouTube上最近的出版物都主张其在患者教育方面的潜力。但是,缺少关于可以在YouTube上进行患者教育的质量信息的可靠描述。目的确定科学文献中与YouTube上的患者教育质量信息概念相关的主题。方法在MEDLINE,ISI Web of Knowledge,Scopus和PsychINFO中进行了文献综述。摘要的选择首先由两名独立的审稿人进行。差异在第二次抽象审阅中与另外两名独立审阅者进行了讨论。对所选论文的全文进行了分析,以寻找其作者使用的概念,定义和主题,这些概念,定义和主题专注于YouTube上用于患者教育的信息质量。结果共提取456篇摘要,对符合条件的13篇论文进行分析。所确定的与患者教育信息质量有关的概念可分为专家驱动,人气驱动或启发式驱动的措施。这些包括(按降序排列):(1)10/13中的内容质量(77%),(2)9/13中的观看次数(69%),(3)8/13中的卫生专业意见(62%) ),(4)在6/13中具有足够的长度或持续时间(46%),(5)在5/13中具有公共评级(39%),(6)在5/13中具有足够的标题,标签和说明(39%) ,(7)在4/13中具有良好的描述或全面的叙述(31%),(8)在4/13中包含基于证据的实践视频(31%),(9)在4/13中适合作为教学工具(31%),(10)4/13(31%)的技术质量,(11)视频在4/13(31%)中提供的凭据,(12)足够的内容以在3/13中确定其目标(23%)和(13)收视率在2/13(15%)的份额中。结论我们的审查证实,与YouTube上的患者教育信息质量相关的当前主题尚不清楚,而且不规范。尽管使用专家驱动的,受欢迎程度驱动的或启发式驱动的方法来估计视频信息的质量,但是在将YouTube用于健康促进和患者教育材料时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号