首页> 外文期刊>Information Research >We still trust in Google, but less than 10 years ago: an eye-tracking study
【24h】

We still trust in Google, but less than 10 years ago: an eye-tracking study

机译:我们仍然信任Google,但是不到十年前:一项眼球追踪研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The purpose of this study is to replicate a study from 2007, which found that student users trust in Google's ability to rank results more than in their own relevance judgements.In a between-subjects experiment using eye-tracking methodology, participants (n=25) worked on search tasks where the results ranking on search engine results pages had been manipulated. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests and mixed model analyses with the statistical program SPSS. This study confirms major results from the study we replicated, but finds one important difference: although the viewing behaviour was influenced more by the position than by the relevance of a snippet, the crucial factor for a result to be clicked was the relevance and not its position on the results page. The subjects of our experiment displayed an emancipated search behaviour while choosing relevant snippets even in lower positions. This means that, despite the fact that students were influenced by the position of a result, they made choices on the basis of relevance.
机译:这项研究的目的是重复一项2007年的研究,该研究发现,学生用户对Google的排名能力的信任程度超过了他们对自己的相关性判断的信任。在一项使用眼动追踪方法的受试者间实验中,参与者(n = 25 )从事搜索任务,其中操纵了搜索引擎结果页面上的结果排名。使用描述性统计数据,方差分析(ANOVA),t检验和统计程序SPSS进行的混合模型分析对数据进行了分析。这项研究证实了我们重复研究的主要结果,但是发现了一个重要的区别:尽管观看行为受位置的影响比受摘要的相关性影响更大,但点击结果的关键因素是相关性而不是其影响力。在结果页面上的位置。我们的实验对象即使在较低的位置选择相关代码片段,也显示出解放的搜索行为。这意味着,尽管事实上学生受到结果位置的影响,但他们还是根据相关性做出选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号