...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury Epidemiology >In-hospital mortality among patients injured in motor vehicle crashes in a Saudi Arabian hospital relative to large U.S. trauma centers
【24h】

In-hospital mortality among patients injured in motor vehicle crashes in a Saudi Arabian hospital relative to large U.S. trauma centers

机译:相对于美国大型创伤中心,在沙特阿拉伯一家医院中因车祸而受伤的患者的院内死亡率

获取原文

摘要

Background Traffic-related fatalities are a leading cause of premature death worldwide. According to the 2012 report the Global Burden of Disease 2010, traffic injuries ranked 8th as a cause of death in 2010, compared to 10th in 1990. Saudi Arabia is estimated to have an overall traffic fatality rate more than double that of the U.S., but it is unknown whether mortality differences also exist for injured patients seeking medical care. We aim to compare in-hospital mortality between Saudi Arabia and the United States, adjusting for severity and demographic variables. Methods The analysis included 485,611 patients from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and 5,290 patients from a trauma registry at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. For comparability, we restricted our sample to NTDB data from level-I public trauma centers (≥400 beds) in the U.S. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of setting (KAMC vs. NTDB) on in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, Triage-Revised Scale (T-RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism of injury, hypotension, surgery and head injuries. Interactions between setting and ISS, and predictors were also evaluated. Results Injured patients in the Saudi registry were more likely to be males, and younger than those from the NTDB. Patients at the Saudi hospital were at higher risk of in-hospital death than their U.S. counterparts. In the highest severity group (ISSs, 25–75), the odds ratio of in-hospital death in KAMC versus NTDB was 5.0 (95% CI 4.3-5.8). There were no differences in mortality between KAMC and NTDB among patients from lower ISS groups (ISSs, 1–8, 9–15, and 16–24). Conclusions Patients who are severely injured following traffic crash injuries in Saudi Arabia are significantly more likely to die in the hospital than comparable patients admitted to large U.S. trauma centers. Further research is needed to identify reasons for this disparity and strategies for improving the care of patients severely injured in traffic crashes in Saudi Arabia.
机译:背景与交通有关的死亡是世界范围内过早死亡的主要原因。根据2012年《 2010年全球疾病负担》报告,2010年交通事故死因排名第八,而1990年则为10。据估计,沙特阿拉伯的整体交通致死率是美国的两倍以上,但尚不清楚受伤的患者就医时是否也存在死亡率差异。我们旨在比较沙特阿拉伯和美国之间的院内死亡率,并根据严重程度和人口统计学变量进行调整。方法该分析包括来自美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)的485,611位患者和沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城(KAMC)的创伤登记处的5,290位患者。为了进行比较,我们将样本限于美国一级I级公共创伤中心(≥400张病床)的NTDB数据,进行了多因素Logistic回归分析,以评估调整后(KAMC vs. NTDB)对住院死亡率的影响的年龄,性别,修订的分诊量表(T-RTS),损伤严重程度评分(ISS),损伤机制,低血压,手术和头部受伤。还评估了环境与国际空间站之间的相互作用以及预测因子。结果与NTDB相比,Saudi注册表中受伤的患者更可能是男性,并且年龄较小。与美国同行相比,沙特医院的患者院内死亡风险更高。在最高严重程度组(ISS,25-75)中,KAMC与NTDB的院内死亡比值比为5.0(95%CI 4.3-5.8)。较低ISS组(ISS,1–8、9–15和16–24)的患者在KAMC和NTDB之间的死亡率没有差异。结论在沙特阿拉伯发生交通事故受伤后受重伤的患者比在美国大型创伤中心接受治疗的同类患者死亡的可能性要高得多。需要进行进一步的研究以确定这种差异的原因,并提出改善沙特阿拉伯交通事故中受重伤的患者的护理的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号